What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
Bad Bokeh on new 100-400mm (or not?)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JohnZ" data-source="post: 1512459" data-attributes="member: 35572"><p>I fear that we are going to have to beg to differ on this RJL. I still maintain that the closer you can get to the subject the better off you will be.</p><p>I have posted a couple more shots that, hopefully, demonstrate that you can still get some sort of bokeh even if it is not the best possible. The Wagtail shot was taken at Elmley and the grass behind the bird was less than 4 feet away. The Golden plover shot was just a continuation of the grass. The Redshank shot is possibly the worst example but still shows a bokeh of sorts.</p><p>I should also add that all of the shots were taken with the Canon 400mm prime lens.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JohnZ, post: 1512459, member: 35572"] I fear that we are going to have to beg to differ on this RJL. I still maintain that the closer you can get to the subject the better off you will be. I have posted a couple more shots that, hopefully, demonstrate that you can still get some sort of bokeh even if it is not the best possible. The Wagtail shot was taken at Elmley and the grass behind the bird was less than 4 feet away. The Golden plover shot was just a continuation of the grass. The Redshank shot is possibly the worst example but still shows a bokeh of sorts. I should also add that all of the shots were taken with the Canon 400mm prime lens. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
Bad Bokeh on new 100-400mm (or not?)
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top