• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Where premium quality meets exceptional value. ZEISS Conquest HDX.

Best combo SS+Ep. Fixed for you? (1 Viewer)

Granpoli

Well-known member
Spain
Hello,
What is the best combination of spotting scope + fixed magnification wide angle eyepiece that you have been able to observe?
It is said that a zoom is more flexible but the vision of an ep. with fixed power it is of higher quality. No?
Thank you
G. poly.
 
What is the best combination of spotting scope + fixed magnification wide angle eyepiece that you have been able to observe?
Most modern scopes are only available with zoom eyepieces. There are some exceptions, for instance Nikon still makes a fixed WA for the Monarch scopes. Modern zooms are so good that the limiting factor is always the quality of the scope: If you get a cherry, you'll have excellent optical quality. If you get a lemon, you won't. Welcome to the scope lottery ...
It is said that a zoom is more flexible but the vision of an ep. with fixed power it is of higher quality. No?
Maybe. But like I said, it's the quality of the scope (more precisely: the individual specimen, you attach the eyepieces to) that determines the quality of the whole combo.

Hermann
 
I have the Monarch ED 82, and no matter how much I like the zooms (I have both) I always gravitate back to the 38x WF for its immersive view and long eye relief.

I'm lucky. I just repeated a star test today with the 30-60x WF zoom, and got perfect concentric circles at 60x, both sides of focus. As Hermann, said it's the scope itself. My EP choice may seem contradictory, but the 30-60 zoom works best with my PhoneSkope adapter.

The 38x WF just gives me the wow factor.

Cheers
 
A fixed focal length eyepiece would always have the potential to be better corrected for aberrations than a zoom eyepiece, however the differences may be so small that the flexibility of the zoom might prevail.

Nikon state that the MEP-38W (30/38x for the 60 & 82 mm Monarch Fieldscopes) "effectively corrects curvature of field and astigmatism, realising uniformly high resolution all the way to the periphery." This applies to the 30x W on my Swarovski ATM65 HD. I cannot detect any loss of sharpness at the field edge and it has 65° AFoV and 20 mm eye relief. In addition the scope itself is diffraction limited, so for a 30x scope of this size it comes as close to perfection as anyone could wish.

On a 1951 USAF test chart the 25-60x zoom on my Kowa 883 shows a little astigmatism at the field edge but I doubt that anyone could see it under field conditions. The AFoV at 25x is very acceptable at 57° and improves to 69° at the higher magnifications and eye relief is adequate for glasses wearers.

A fixed focal length eyepiece on a larger scope would preclude the (infrequent?) use of higher magnifications, but conversely makes sense on a smaller scope, where the window between adequate magnification (>20x) and image brightness (exit pupil >2 mm) limits the range of usable magnifications.

John
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top