What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Multimedia
Books, Magazines, Publications, Video & DVD
Best European Field Guides – a mini-review
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="John Cantelo" data-source="post: 1376460" data-attributes="member: 2844"><p>I think this judgement a little harsh - it still covers most (all?) species a <strong>beginner</strong> is likely see in the areas you mention even though that the maps don't show distribution is an admitted drawback . Despite the <em>'NW Europe' </em>in the title, it's still, surprisingly, useful for Mediterranean birds too. Of the 35-40 'core European species' missing most are relatively scarce or obscure (i.e. real <em>birders' birds</em>) and restricted mainly the the Balkans and, to a lesser extent, Iberia. In fact, with 2 species per page and fewer pages than most other guides (298pp) it's surprisngly they've never published a slightly larger edition to cover the whole of Europe as you'd only need 20 odd more pages. (Incidentally, the Dutch did much the same thing with the old Shell Guide, but somewhat puzzlingly, this was never taken up as a European field guide in the UK),</p><p></p><p>In my view, the larger illustrations, clear layout and fewer unecessary 'confusion' species more than makes up for any shortfall in the species covered as far as the inexperienced are concerned.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="John Cantelo, post: 1376460, member: 2844"] I think this judgement a little harsh - it still covers most (all?) species a [B]beginner[/B] is likely see in the areas you mention even though that the maps don't show distribution is an admitted drawback . Despite the [I]'NW Europe' [/I]in the title, it's still, surprisingly, useful for Mediterranean birds too. Of the 35-40 'core European species' missing most are relatively scarce or obscure (i.e. real [I]birders' birds[/I]) and restricted mainly the the Balkans and, to a lesser extent, Iberia. In fact, with 2 species per page and fewer pages than most other guides (298pp) it's surprisngly they've never published a slightly larger edition to cover the whole of Europe as you'd only need 20 odd more pages. (Incidentally, the Dutch did much the same thing with the old Shell Guide, but somewhat puzzlingly, this was never taken up as a European field guide in the UK), In my view, the larger illustrations, clear layout and fewer unecessary 'confusion' species more than makes up for any shortfall in the species covered as far as the inexperienced are concerned. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Multimedia
Books, Magazines, Publications, Video & DVD
Best European Field Guides – a mini-review
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top