What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Multimedia
Books, Magazines, Publications, Video & DVD
Best European Field Guides – a mini-review
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="John Cantelo" data-source="post: 1376713" data-attributes="member: 2844"><p>One of my few criticisms of Collins Bird Guide is that, albeit necessarily so, the plates are very crowded. I think that the only book that's resolved the problem of beginers' 'rarity confusion' was the old Shell Guide which partitioned off rarities in a separate section at the back. Beginers automatically went to the main text and, only after failing to find the species before them, did they look in the back at the rarities. </p><p></p><p>The biggest failing of field guides in general is that they are too even handed in dishing out the available space. I've never undertood why Hoopoe and Kingfisher after often allotted a similar amount of space as, say Marsh and Reed Warblers. Some judicious trimming for the blindingly obvious would fee up space for the seriously tricky,</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="John Cantelo, post: 1376713, member: 2844"] One of my few criticisms of Collins Bird Guide is that, albeit necessarily so, the plates are very crowded. I think that the only book that's resolved the problem of beginers' 'rarity confusion' was the old Shell Guide which partitioned off rarities in a separate section at the back. Beginers automatically went to the main text and, only after failing to find the species before them, did they look in the back at the rarities. The biggest failing of field guides in general is that they are too even handed in dishing out the available space. I've never undertood why Hoopoe and Kingfisher after often allotted a similar amount of space as, say Marsh and Reed Warblers. Some judicious trimming for the blindingly obvious would fee up space for the seriously tricky, [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Multimedia
Books, Magazines, Publications, Video & DVD
Best European Field Guides – a mini-review
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top