What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
best low light bino 10x
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="WJC" data-source="post: 3624247" data-attributes="member: 25191"><p>Dennis:</p><p></p><p>I really don’t know why you have singled me out for “making this too complicated.” I guess I’m just an easy target, what with being only a screw turner and all. But, there have been others, including PhDs in physics and NASA senior scientists who have tried to tell you the same thing. Yet, you still base your opinion or your own seemingly infallible perceptions and the advertising rhetoric of Zeiss. Apparently, the graphic didn't do the trick.</p><p></p><p>I have been a Zeiss fan since many participants on this thread were pooping green and can tell you two things with certainty. First, I support you in whatever you want to believe, just as I have told you—more than once—before. But, secondly, I stopped believing in Santa when I was six. Consequently, I think you should support your stance by boldly stating all the learned folks who have tried to reason with you are out of their tree and only you have the knowledge and experience to pass judgment on the subject at hand. Or, maybe, if it is THAT important to you, you could petition Zeiss to issue you a memo to share with us saying all who have counselled you here are nuts. Be sure he gives his legible signature—I’ll take it from there.</p><p></p><p>In addition, I believe such a bold comment would say much more about yourself than those you would be maligning.</p><p></p><p>That’s just a thought. I’m not your enemy, nor do I believe all holders of advanced degrees are infallible or are paragons of wisdom. I’m just wearing low tops and am not prepared to continue traipsing through a field littered with such unsubstantiated—except by your eyes and others not familiar with the physics of the matter—male bovine excrement.</p><p></p><p>It’s just I don’t want the honest and trusting truth seeker to come away with something less when something more is readily available. :cat:</p><p></p><p>Bill</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="WJC, post: 3624247, member: 25191"] Dennis: I really don’t know why you have singled me out for “making this too complicated.” I guess I’m just an easy target, what with being only a screw turner and all. But, there have been others, including PhDs in physics and NASA senior scientists who have tried to tell you the same thing. Yet, you still base your opinion or your own seemingly infallible perceptions and the advertising rhetoric of Zeiss. Apparently, the graphic didn't do the trick. I have been a Zeiss fan since many participants on this thread were pooping green and can tell you two things with certainty. First, I support you in whatever you want to believe, just as I have told you—more than once—before. But, secondly, I stopped believing in Santa when I was six. Consequently, I think you should support your stance by boldly stating all the learned folks who have tried to reason with you are out of their tree and only you have the knowledge and experience to pass judgment on the subject at hand. Or, maybe, if it is THAT important to you, you could petition Zeiss to issue you a memo to share with us saying all who have counselled you here are nuts. Be sure he gives his legible signature—I’ll take it from there. In addition, I believe such a bold comment would say much more about yourself than those you would be maligning. That’s just a thought. I’m not your enemy, nor do I believe all holders of advanced degrees are infallible or are paragons of wisdom. I’m just wearing low tops and am not prepared to continue traipsing through a field littered with such unsubstantiated—except by your eyes and others not familiar with the physics of the matter—male bovine excrement. It’s just I don’t want the honest and trusting truth seeker to come away with something less when something more is readily available. :cat: Bill [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
best low light bino 10x
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top