What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
best low light bino 10x
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="denco@comcast.n" data-source="post: 3624256" data-attributes="member: 25300"><p>"Dennis, there is absolutely no reason whatsoever that Zeiss could not put the appropriate HT glass in the SF without charging a single cent more. With retuned T* coatings to suit, the resultant SF+ would have both higher light transmission AND a more balanced transmission curve with more colourful, more vibrant blues and reds, AND a more neutral colour rendition - finally getting rid of that 'green ham' colour cast ...... of course then they would have to fleece their customers less, but the SF has been out for quite a while now - surely they have made some cost saving productivity increases that they could share with the customer."</p><p></p><p>True. But if they did they would be cannibalizing the sale of their own HT model. If you can get it all on the SF why buy the HT. They have to differentiate their products in some areas.The HT has the low light market and the SF has the big FOV market. So to get it all you have to buy both.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="denco@comcast.n, post: 3624256, member: 25300"] "Dennis, there is absolutely no reason whatsoever that Zeiss could not put the appropriate HT glass in the SF without charging a single cent more. With retuned T* coatings to suit, the resultant SF+ would have both higher light transmission AND a more balanced transmission curve with more colourful, more vibrant blues and reds, AND a more neutral colour rendition - finally getting rid of that 'green ham' colour cast ...... of course then they would have to fleece their customers less, but the SF has been out for quite a while now - surely they have made some cost saving productivity increases that they could share with the customer." True. But if they did they would be cannibalizing the sale of their own HT model. If you can get it all on the SF why buy the HT. They have to differentiate their products in some areas.The HT has the low light market and the SF has the big FOV market. So to get it all you have to buy both. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
best low light bino 10x
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top