What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
Best package for £1600 budget
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Roy C" data-source="post: 1704713" data-attributes="member: 18798"><p>This is a bit different from saying that you cannot get anything decent from the 400/5.6 without using a tripod. You are insulting loads of people on this forum by that comment.</p><p>I have tried the 100-400 and much prefer the 400/5.6 even hand holding but I would never say you cannot get sharp shots from the 100-400 as that would be ridiculous (although I have seen countless hundreds of post on the web saying the 100-400 is soft at the long end).</p><p>I Attached some 100% crops from the 400/5.6 all hand held. shown is the full frame and the crop. Not to bad from a lens where it is impossible to get sharp shots hand held.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Roy C, post: 1704713, member: 18798"] This is a bit different from saying that you cannot get anything decent from the 400/5.6 without using a tripod. You are insulting loads of people on this forum by that comment. I have tried the 100-400 and much prefer the 400/5.6 even hand holding but I would never say you cannot get sharp shots from the 100-400 as that would be ridiculous (although I have seen countless hundreds of post on the web saying the 100-400 is soft at the long end). I Attached some 100% crops from the 400/5.6 all hand held. shown is the full frame and the crop. Not to bad from a lens where it is impossible to get sharp shots hand held. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
Best package for £1600 budget
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top