What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
Best package for £1600 budget
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Roy C" data-source="post: 1705024" data-attributes="member: 18798"><p>Again it seems if you are stating a fact and not just expressing an opinion.</p><p> </p><p>The 100-400 is both heavier and more expensive than the 400/5.6 and there are scores of uses who claim that it is soft at the long end, especially when using wide open as well as the AF being slower. There are also lots of people who do not get on with the push/pull zoom and it would seem there are a lot of copies various out there, not surprising when you consider the complexity of the lens compared with the relatively simple design of the 400/5.6. Even if I were to believe all that I would never say that the 100-400 is not capable super shots leave alone decent ones because it clearly is - <strong>I have seen some stunning shots from the lens.</strong></p><p></p><p>Some of the worlds best bird photographers rate the 400/5.6 as being a superb lens for Birds in flight because of its hand holdability, quick AF and sharpness and yet you stand above them all by saying there is no way they could even get a decent shot leave alone a really good one.</p><p></p><p>I only started this game just over three years. I am a weakling OAP who took the hobby up as something to do in my retirement. I still consider myself very much a novice and at my age I doubt if I will ever get past that stage but I did think that I had made a little progress - up till very recently I had only ever used the 400/5.6 for bird photography (mostly hand held) and to be told (by your Inference) that there is no way I could have got any 'decent' shots from my chosen lens is very demoralising to say the least.</p><p></p><p>We may not all come up to your standards as you have clearly made us aware but at the end of the day for most of us lesser souls it is just a hobby to enjoy - live and let live whatever gear you have :t:</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Roy C, post: 1705024, member: 18798"] Again it seems if you are stating a fact and not just expressing an opinion. The 100-400 is both heavier and more expensive than the 400/5.6 and there are scores of uses who claim that it is soft at the long end, especially when using wide open as well as the AF being slower. There are also lots of people who do not get on with the push/pull zoom and it would seem there are a lot of copies various out there, not surprising when you consider the complexity of the lens compared with the relatively simple design of the 400/5.6. Even if I were to believe all that I would never say that the 100-400 is not capable super shots leave alone decent ones because it clearly is - [B]I have seen some stunning shots from the lens.[/B] Some of the worlds best bird photographers rate the 400/5.6 as being a superb lens for Birds in flight because of its hand holdability, quick AF and sharpness and yet you stand above them all by saying there is no way they could even get a decent shot leave alone a really good one. I only started this game just over three years. I am a weakling OAP who took the hobby up as something to do in my retirement. I still consider myself very much a novice and at my age I doubt if I will ever get past that stage but I did think that I had made a little progress - up till very recently I had only ever used the 400/5.6 for bird photography (mostly hand held) and to be told (by your Inference) that there is no way I could have got any 'decent' shots from my chosen lens is very demoralising to say the least. We may not all come up to your standards as you have clearly made us aware but at the end of the day for most of us lesser souls it is just a hobby to enjoy - live and let live whatever gear you have :t: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
Best package for £1600 budget
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top