What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Others
best vintage bino for night time wildlife viewing
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="waterman74" data-source="post: 3286946" data-attributes="member: 134203"><p><strong>The 8x40's...ish</strong></p><p></p><p><u>Olympus EXPS I 8x42</u>, BAK4, No indication where these are made, Sharp edge to edge, Very good lowlight performance.</p><p></p><p><u>Bushnell H20 8x42</u>, BAK4, No indication where these are made, Sharp to at least 80%, Good lowlight performance.</p><p></p><p><u>Jason Clipper #120 8x40</u> EWA, J-B133 BAK7 , Sharp to 70%, Ok lowlight performance.</p><p></p><p><u>Sears #6215 8x40</u> , J-E25-J-B52 BAK7, Sharp to 70%, Ok lowlight performance.</p><p></p><p><u>Comments:</u> The Jason edged out the Sears in daylight, but there was no appreciable difference in lowlight. The Olympus was a little better than the Bushnell in daylight and lowlight and the Bushnell was better than both the Jason and the Sears in both categories. A quick note about the Olympus, they had a VERY generous Eye relief, most I've every seen, and they are nice and compact. After using the Bushnell for several years and being very happy, the Olympus is everything that the Bushnell are and more, I paid $79 shipped for the Olympus and somewhere around $60 for the Bushnell.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="waterman74, post: 3286946, member: 134203"] [B]The 8x40's...ish[/B] [U]Olympus EXPS I 8x42[/U], BAK4, No indication where these are made, Sharp edge to edge, Very good lowlight performance. [U]Bushnell H20 8x42[/U], BAK4, No indication where these are made, Sharp to at least 80%, Good lowlight performance. [U]Jason Clipper #120 8x40[/U] EWA, J-B133 BAK7 , Sharp to 70%, Ok lowlight performance. [U]Sears #6215 8x40[/U] , J-E25-J-B52 BAK7, Sharp to 70%, Ok lowlight performance. [U]Comments:[/U] The Jason edged out the Sears in daylight, but there was no appreciable difference in lowlight. The Olympus was a little better than the Bushnell in daylight and lowlight and the Bushnell was better than both the Jason and the Sears in both categories. A quick note about the Olympus, they had a VERY generous Eye relief, most I've every seen, and they are nice and compact. After using the Bushnell for several years and being very happy, the Olympus is everything that the Bushnell are and more, I paid $79 shipped for the Olympus and somewhere around $60 for the Bushnell. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Others
best vintage bino for night time wildlife viewing
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top