What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Swarovski
Big fan of Porro prism .
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="phlazm" data-source="post: 3563062" data-attributes="member: 131862"><p>Let me know if I'm asking this in the wrong place please, but I'm trying to get a feel for the difference between a porro with very high transmission and a roof prism with a larger diameter. In this case I'm looking at a Habicht 8x30w which has a 96% (maybe 98 I don't recall exactly) and a high end Zeiss or similar alpha bino with a 40 or 42 lens. Which would be brighter, the larger lens with lower transmission or the smaller lens with higher transmission?</p><p></p><p>Yes, I'm splitting hairs and would probably be happy with either, but now I'm curious. I have a late Zeiss Classic 10x40 that is much brighter than a 1960s Habicht 8x30, but that isn't a fair comparison given the age and coating differences. Anyhow, any knowledge you can share is, as always, appreciated. Cheers.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="phlazm, post: 3563062, member: 131862"] Let me know if I'm asking this in the wrong place please, but I'm trying to get a feel for the difference between a porro with very high transmission and a roof prism with a larger diameter. In this case I'm looking at a Habicht 8x30w which has a 96% (maybe 98 I don't recall exactly) and a high end Zeiss or similar alpha bino with a 40 or 42 lens. Which would be brighter, the larger lens with lower transmission or the smaller lens with higher transmission? Yes, I'm splitting hairs and would probably be happy with either, but now I'm curious. I have a late Zeiss Classic 10x40 that is much brighter than a 1960s Habicht 8x30, but that isn't a fair comparison given the age and coating differences. Anyhow, any knowledge you can share is, as always, appreciated. Cheers. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Swarovski
Big fan of Porro prism .
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top