What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Birds & Birding
Big Listers v Big % Finders?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="amears" data-source="post: 3564343" data-attributes="member: 70879"><p>The punks dealt very well with what is and isn't self found - still on the web if you look for it.</p><p></p><p>Some people seem to have a genuine talent for bird finding. I admire them and would love to be like them but alas, never will. But it is such a thrill to find something rare that I sacrifice twitching to increase my chances of pulling it off.</p><p></p><p>My take on measuring self-finds - a simple count, %s are not useful.</p><p></p><p>Why Britain, etc? Paul nailed it.</p><p></p><p>Trainspotting, etc? No! We also have conservation as a massive string to our bow. How many on here have contributed to something like atlas surveys or WEBS counts? Loads I bet.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="amears, post: 3564343, member: 70879"] The punks dealt very well with what is and isn't self found - still on the web if you look for it. Some people seem to have a genuine talent for bird finding. I admire them and would love to be like them but alas, never will. But it is such a thrill to find something rare that I sacrifice twitching to increase my chances of pulling it off. My take on measuring self-finds - a simple count, %s are not useful. Why Britain, etc? Paul nailed it. Trainspotting, etc? No! We also have conservation as a massive string to our bow. How many on here have contributed to something like atlas surveys or WEBS counts? Loads I bet. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Birds & Birding
Big Listers v Big % Finders?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top