What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Birds & Birding
Big Listers v Big % Finders?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MKinHK" data-source="post: 3564564" data-attributes="member: 21760"><p>Another aspect that influences the self-found strike rate is how many others cover the same sites. Lots of birders covering a site equals lower likelihood of self-finding because someone else may have found it first. </p><p></p><p>While I'm happy to twitch and bird with others, I often bird on my own and my patches have mostly been my own, with other birders generally visiting after I have had a good run of migrants or, less regularly, pull out a quality bird, so my self-found strike rate in Hong Kong is 88% (405 out of 460).</p><p></p><p>But the extra coverage these birders bring also delivers birds, which I am delighted to see. </p><p></p><p>So, to take this to absurd levels . . . could/should I be also claiming some sort of self-found credit for these because they'd never have been found unless I'd been digging up the birds that attracted the finders to come in the first place?<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p>Cheers</p><p>Mike</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MKinHK, post: 3564564, member: 21760"] Another aspect that influences the self-found strike rate is how many others cover the same sites. Lots of birders covering a site equals lower likelihood of self-finding because someone else may have found it first. While I'm happy to twitch and bird with others, I often bird on my own and my patches have mostly been my own, with other birders generally visiting after I have had a good run of migrants or, less regularly, pull out a quality bird, so my self-found strike rate in Hong Kong is 88% (405 out of 460). But the extra coverage these birders bring also delivers birds, which I am delighted to see. So, to take this to absurd levels . . . could/should I be also claiming some sort of self-found credit for these because they'd never have been found unless I'd been digging up the birds that attracted the finders to come in the first place?;) Cheers Mike [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Birds & Birding
Big Listers v Big % Finders?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top