What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Biggest reverse porro?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="elkcub" data-source="post: 1515507" data-attributes="member: 14473"><p>Hmmm. Going back to your earlier statement, you may not be strictly referring to tunnel vision, which is generally accepted as resulting from limiting the peripheral view. My only contribution to that, in the case of binocular usage, is the speculation that limited peripheral <em>stimulation</em>, rather than a limited image, may be the trigger for the percept. That could be verified in a psychophysics lab with controlled apparatus. For all I know there could also be large individual differences. </p><p></p><p>I don't follow how the rigidity/flexibility of the eyecups relates to perceived size of the apparent field, except for possibly allowing more light to enter around the edges; but I may be experiencing tunnel thinking again. </p><p></p><p>As for myself, at this point I'm going back and forth with eyeglasses. In the process I've become rather aware of perceptual changes, and associated preferences. The Zeiss 7x42, for example, is phenomenal with glasses and less so without. Same with the 8x32SE. The reverse is true of the 804. </p><p></p><p>Regards,</p><p>Ed</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="elkcub, post: 1515507, member: 14473"] Hmmm. Going back to your earlier statement, you may not be strictly referring to tunnel vision, which is generally accepted as resulting from limiting the peripheral view. My only contribution to that, in the case of binocular usage, is the speculation that limited peripheral [i]stimulation[/i], rather than a limited image, may be the trigger for the percept. That could be verified in a psychophysics lab with controlled apparatus. For all I know there could also be large individual differences. I don't follow how the rigidity/flexibility of the eyecups relates to perceived size of the apparent field, except for possibly allowing more light to enter around the edges; but I may be experiencing tunnel thinking again. As for myself, at this point I'm going back and forth with eyeglasses. In the process I've become rather aware of perceptual changes, and associated preferences. The Zeiss 7x42, for example, is phenomenal with glasses and less so without. Same with the 8x32SE. The reverse is true of the 804. Regards, Ed [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Biggest reverse porro?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top