What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Binocular advice please
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="typo" data-source="post: 3394225" data-attributes="member: 83808"><p>You could argue that either way depending on your priorities. </p><p></p><p>The Vanguard has a flatter view, sharper edges and appeared to have a better effective resolution than most samples of the Conquest HDs I've tried. I also thought the contrast was deeper under blue skies. However it's quite possible that these advantages are low or zero priority to you. </p><p></p><p>The Conquest HD probably has slightly more refined engineering, it looks better, worked better ergonomically for me. In poor light, particularly around sunset, the better blue transmission made it appear brighter and sharper, and it's also rather more forgiving on eye positing. The blue badge definitely has more cachet.</p><p></p><p>I personally wouldn't pay twice the price for the Conquest with my priorities but there are many testimonies from those on the forum 'see' things differently. Your eyes are going to be very different from mine but from the little I know about cataracts and your needs I'm not sure I would put either at the top of a shortlist as I've suggested previously.</p><p></p><p>David</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="typo, post: 3394225, member: 83808"] You could argue that either way depending on your priorities. The Vanguard has a flatter view, sharper edges and appeared to have a better effective resolution than most samples of the Conquest HDs I've tried. I also thought the contrast was deeper under blue skies. However it's quite possible that these advantages are low or zero priority to you. The Conquest HD probably has slightly more refined engineering, it looks better, worked better ergonomically for me. In poor light, particularly around sunset, the better blue transmission made it appear brighter and sharper, and it's also rather more forgiving on eye positing. The blue badge definitely has more cachet. I personally wouldn't pay twice the price for the Conquest with my priorities but there are many testimonies from those on the forum 'see' things differently. Your eyes are going to be very different from mine but from the little I know about cataracts and your needs I'm not sure I would put either at the top of a shortlist as I've suggested previously. David [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Binocular advice please
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top