What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Binocular faults: correct terminology?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="John Dracon" data-source="post: 2855995" data-attributes="member: 14799"><p>Dave - a non-scientific word yet useful word to decribe having the optical elements moving so that the desired focal points are repeatable is the word "timing."</p><p>The current binocular designs have to be able to move the optical elements back and forth with accuracy and repeatability, if they are to be useful. </p><p></p><p>To accommodate the difference between eyes in resolving power (there are of course other eye issues which cannot be resolved by adjustments , e.g. astigmatism), the diopter adjustment (normally on the right barrel) also comes into play. Some binoculars, normally the more expensive, incorporate the diopiter mechanism internally, but this reguires very sophisticated mechanisms and mechanical relationships. Most internal focusing designs enhance waterproofness. </p><p></p><p>The classic way of dealing with it is found in CF binoculars with oculars which move back and forth, and the right ocular can be adjusted still further. This requires close tolerances as the ocular casings have to slide in a sleeve, and minute bits of whatever can be drawn into the mechanism causing galling and other problems. The excellent B&L Zephyr binoculars and many other external focusing CF binoculars have this problem. If one side hangs up, then a timing problem in focus is created. </p><p></p><p>Even my Zeiss alphas such as the 7x42 BGTA and 15x60 BGTA are subject to timing issues. The only design that I have used that seems to avoid this without extraordinary costs is the IF binocular. The Zeiss 8x30 Safari model illustrates this easily.</p><p>All the optical elements save the oculars are fixed internally. The oculars movements are snug and creates water and dust proof interiors. This designs allows also collimation to be unaffected when the oculars are moved in and out. But of course the IF binocular is hardly a handy birding binocular. </p><p></p><p>When comparing the least expensive Zeiss, the Terra to the most expensive model, the HT, Zeiss incorporated the effective and time tested diopter adjustment, the external friction system. Undoubtedly less expensive to do than the system in the HT.</p><p>IMO many of the simpler designs minimize timing problems.</p><p></p><p>John</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="John Dracon, post: 2855995, member: 14799"] Dave - a non-scientific word yet useful word to decribe having the optical elements moving so that the desired focal points are repeatable is the word "timing." The current binocular designs have to be able to move the optical elements back and forth with accuracy and repeatability, if they are to be useful. To accommodate the difference between eyes in resolving power (there are of course other eye issues which cannot be resolved by adjustments , e.g. astigmatism), the diopter adjustment (normally on the right barrel) also comes into play. Some binoculars, normally the more expensive, incorporate the diopiter mechanism internally, but this reguires very sophisticated mechanisms and mechanical relationships. Most internal focusing designs enhance waterproofness. The classic way of dealing with it is found in CF binoculars with oculars which move back and forth, and the right ocular can be adjusted still further. This requires close tolerances as the ocular casings have to slide in a sleeve, and minute bits of whatever can be drawn into the mechanism causing galling and other problems. The excellent B&L Zephyr binoculars and many other external focusing CF binoculars have this problem. If one side hangs up, then a timing problem in focus is created. Even my Zeiss alphas such as the 7x42 BGTA and 15x60 BGTA are subject to timing issues. The only design that I have used that seems to avoid this without extraordinary costs is the IF binocular. The Zeiss 8x30 Safari model illustrates this easily. All the optical elements save the oculars are fixed internally. The oculars movements are snug and creates water and dust proof interiors. This designs allows also collimation to be unaffected when the oculars are moved in and out. But of course the IF binocular is hardly a handy birding binocular. When comparing the least expensive Zeiss, the Terra to the most expensive model, the HT, Zeiss incorporated the effective and time tested diopter adjustment, the external friction system. Undoubtedly less expensive to do than the system in the HT. IMO many of the simpler designs minimize timing problems. John [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Binocular faults: correct terminology?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top