What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Binocular length
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Binastro" data-source="post: 3651807" data-attributes="member: 111403"><p>Don't know about DOF but I was able to measure distances of a mile, maybe more, with the 317mm Dall Kirkham, 4650mm focal length, just by the focus position of the eyepiece compared to the stars.</p><p>So I don't think the DOF was that great, although it could be.</p><p>I don't think the 317mm aperture was stopped down at high magnification.</p><p></p><p>I suppose it was similar to a 317mm base rangefinder with high magnification, although I haven't done calculations to compare.</p><p></p><p>I also had an approximately 6ft rangefinder possibly Barr and Stroud, which measured miles I think. I can't remember the maximum accurate range or the accuracy.</p><p></p><p>P.S.</p><p>Apparently the Americans used stereoscopic rangefinders and the British Barr and Stroud were coincidence rangefinders.</p><p>The stereoscopic and coincidence acuities were about equal in tests.</p><p>4.5m American and 3m British instruments.</p><p>Ranges 4,000 yards to 12,000 yards approx.</p><p></p><p>Laser rangefinders are used nowadays but can give away the observer's position.</p><p></p><p>I suppose the DOF in binoculars and telescopes depends on the observer's accommodation and acuity?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Binastro, post: 3651807, member: 111403"] Don't know about DOF but I was able to measure distances of a mile, maybe more, with the 317mm Dall Kirkham, 4650mm focal length, just by the focus position of the eyepiece compared to the stars. So I don't think the DOF was that great, although it could be. I don't think the 317mm aperture was stopped down at high magnification. I suppose it was similar to a 317mm base rangefinder with high magnification, although I haven't done calculations to compare. I also had an approximately 6ft rangefinder possibly Barr and Stroud, which measured miles I think. I can't remember the maximum accurate range or the accuracy. P.S. Apparently the Americans used stereoscopic rangefinders and the British Barr and Stroud were coincidence rangefinders. The stereoscopic and coincidence acuities were about equal in tests. 4.5m American and 3m British instruments. Ranges 4,000 yards to 12,000 yards approx. Laser rangefinders are used nowadays but can give away the observer's position. I suppose the DOF in binoculars and telescopes depends on the observer's accommodation and acuity? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Binocular length
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top