What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Pentax
Binoculars as microscope - Penta Papilio 6.5x21 vs Minox BF 10x42
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Binastro" data-source="post: 3243444" data-attributes="member: 111403"><p>. Although I said that the 10-25×42 waterproof zoom binocular was not very good optically. This was when I tried it for astronomy and general use.</p><p>However, I just tried it for macro use at 25 times, which I presume is fairly accurate.</p><p></p><p>The closest focus that I can get, being longsighted, is 75 cm from my eye or 57 cm from the front of the monocular. It is impossible to hold it steady, so I think that one would have to use a tripod. I don't need glasses.</p><p></p><p>Looking at a glass of water at the closest distance, the bubbles are very well seen.</p><p></p><p>But if somebody needs to wear glasses, then the field is much restricted at 25 times. But maybe with an exit pupil of around 1.7 mm glasses are not needed?. It is possible that this is a useful instrument, although the 10×42 may focus closer and probably has better optical quality and a wider field of view.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Binastro, post: 3243444, member: 111403"] . Although I said that the 10-25×42 waterproof zoom binocular was not very good optically. This was when I tried it for astronomy and general use. However, I just tried it for macro use at 25 times, which I presume is fairly accurate. The closest focus that I can get, being longsighted, is 75 cm from my eye or 57 cm from the front of the monocular. It is impossible to hold it steady, so I think that one would have to use a tripod. I don't need glasses. Looking at a glass of water at the closest distance, the bubbles are very well seen. But if somebody needs to wear glasses, then the field is much restricted at 25 times. But maybe with an exit pupil of around 1.7 mm glasses are not needed?. It is possible that this is a useful instrument, although the 10×42 may focus closer and probably has better optical quality and a wider field of view. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Pentax
Binoculars as microscope - Penta Papilio 6.5x21 vs Minox BF 10x42
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top