What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Binos with or without field flatteners
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Alexis Powell" data-source="post: 3584343" data-attributes="member: 5327"><p>In fact, Nikon has been using field flatteners in their best porros and roofs starting _long_ before 1998 and 2001.</p><p></p><p>For example, the Nikon 7x50 ProStar (porro), 10x70 Astroluxe (porro), and 8x40 Classic Eagle (roof), all use field flatteners. They were all introduced in ~1984. Fuji has also long used field flatteners. I suspect use of flatteners may go back decades earlier, but those are the earliest models with which I have experience. My first serious birding bins were the 8x40 Classic Eagle, which to my eye were clearly superior to the Zeiss and Leica competition until introduction of phase coatings by those companies in ~1988 tipped the balance of overall optical quality to their favor. Still, I missed the big easy flat sweet spot of my Classic Eagles for many years (during which I used Zeiss 7x42 BGATP as my primary birding bin) and have only been fully optically satisfied since Swarovski put it all together in the 8.5x42 EL Swarovision. </p><p></p><p>--AP</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Alexis Powell, post: 3584343, member: 5327"] In fact, Nikon has been using field flatteners in their best porros and roofs starting _long_ before 1998 and 2001. For example, the Nikon 7x50 ProStar (porro), 10x70 Astroluxe (porro), and 8x40 Classic Eagle (roof), all use field flatteners. They were all introduced in ~1984. Fuji has also long used field flatteners. I suspect use of flatteners may go back decades earlier, but those are the earliest models with which I have experience. My first serious birding bins were the 8x40 Classic Eagle, which to my eye were clearly superior to the Zeiss and Leica competition until introduction of phase coatings by those companies in ~1988 tipped the balance of overall optical quality to their favor. Still, I missed the big easy flat sweet spot of my Classic Eagles for many years (during which I used Zeiss 7x42 BGATP as my primary birding bin) and have only been fully optically satisfied since Swarovski put it all together in the 8.5x42 EL Swarovision. --AP [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Binos with or without field flatteners
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top