What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Binos with or without field flatteners
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="WJC" data-source="post: 3584370" data-attributes="member: 25191"><p><strong><span style="font-size: 15px">19</span></strong> <strong>“IT’S ‘TACK SHARP’ FROM THE CENTER TO THE EDGE.”</strong></p><p></p><p>More than one knowledgeable observer has praised his binocular for providing “tack sharp” images from the center to the edge of the field. However, those who make such claims don’t have the capacity to observe images on axis and at the edge of the field in the same instant. </p><p></p><p>The observer may see a “crystal clear” image in the center of the field, then, on seeing an equally crisp image at the edge of that field, supposes all points in between must provide images of equal sharpness, all the time. But to the brain, it just isn’t so. </p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>A Reality Check</strong></p><p></p><p>Concentrate on the tiny space between “image” and “in” in the preceding paragraph. If you’re unwavering in your concentration, you’ll notice the most you can make out are those two words; some people can’t even do that. Now, with your eyes frozen on that tiny space, try to see the “r” in “clear” or the “c” in “center.” Although the separation in this example is far less than one would find in a binocular’s field of view, it’s plain to see our sharply focused field is very restricted, not by the physical optics of the binocular but by physiological optics controlled by the brain. </p><p></p><p>An observer with a high quality instrument can easily come away with the wrong conclusion because he’s not paying attention to the millisecond eye movements that place the edge of the binocular’s field of view in the center of his own or the slight dioptric accommodation that accompanies that movement. </p><p></p><p><strong>A Talk with an Optometrist</strong></p><p></p><p>Wanting to be certain not to share more than I know about this subject, I called on optometrist, Dr. Edward R. Ford, of Ford Family Eye Care in Twin Falls, Idaho who offered the following:</p><p></p><p><em>“The corneal thickness centrally is thinner than it is peripherally, thus causing a change in refractive error from the eye’s central line of sight to its peripheral line of sight. Now, aside from the optics of the cornea, aqueous, pupil, lens and vitreous not being perfect, perhaps the largest issue with the eye’s peripheral vision lies at the level of the retina.*As you know, the retina consists of photoreceptors called rods and cones. The rods provide light sensitivity and motion detection, while the cones provide the detail and color vision. The center of the retina, known as the macula, consists of the highest concentration of cones while the peripheral retina has the higher concentration of rods. With that in mind, it makes sense that the central retina or macula gives us the sharpest acuity, while the peripheral vision does not.”</em></p><p></p><p>This explains the value of the millisecond eye movement and dioptric accommodation that most observers never consider.*:cat:</p><p></p><p>Just a thought,</p><p></p><p>Bill</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="WJC, post: 3584370, member: 25191"] [B][SIZE="4"]19[/SIZE][/B] [B]“IT’S ‘TACK SHARP’ FROM THE CENTER TO THE EDGE.”[/B] More than one knowledgeable observer has praised his binocular for providing “tack sharp” images from the center to the edge of the field. However, those who make such claims don’t have the capacity to observe images on axis and at the edge of the field in the same instant. The observer may see a “crystal clear” image in the center of the field, then, on seeing an equally crisp image at the edge of that field, supposes all points in between must provide images of equal sharpness, all the time. But to the brain, it just isn’t so. [B] A Reality Check[/B] Concentrate on the tiny space between “image” and “in” in the preceding paragraph. If you’re unwavering in your concentration, you’ll notice the most you can make out are those two words; some people can’t even do that. Now, with your eyes frozen on that tiny space, try to see the “r” in “clear” or the “c” in “center.” Although the separation in this example is far less than one would find in a binocular’s field of view, it’s plain to see our sharply focused field is very restricted, not by the physical optics of the binocular but by physiological optics controlled by the brain. An observer with a high quality instrument can easily come away with the wrong conclusion because he’s not paying attention to the millisecond eye movements that place the edge of the binocular’s field of view in the center of his own or the slight dioptric accommodation that accompanies that movement. [B]A Talk with an Optometrist[/B] Wanting to be certain not to share more than I know about this subject, I called on optometrist, Dr. Edward R. Ford, of Ford Family Eye Care in Twin Falls, Idaho who offered the following: [I]“The corneal thickness centrally is thinner than it is peripherally, thus causing a change in refractive error from the eye’s central line of sight to its peripheral line of sight. Now, aside from the optics of the cornea, aqueous, pupil, lens and vitreous not being perfect, perhaps the largest issue with the eye’s peripheral vision lies at the level of the retina.*As you know, the retina consists of photoreceptors called rods and cones. The rods provide light sensitivity and motion detection, while the cones provide the detail and color vision. The center of the retina, known as the macula, consists of the highest concentration of cones while the peripheral retina has the higher concentration of rods. With that in mind, it makes sense that the central retina or macula gives us the sharpest acuity, while the peripheral vision does not.”[/I] This explains the value of the millisecond eye movement and dioptric accommodation that most observers never consider.*:cat: Just a thought, Bill [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Binos with or without field flatteners
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top