What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Binos with or without field flatteners
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Nixterdemus" data-source="post: 3597689" data-attributes="member: 96265"><p>I yearned for bins w/FF thinking they would be the end-all of glass. Nevah could save enough moolah, but I kept buying bins. Finally, it dawned on me that what I liked was little PC. To the point of seeing artifacts of AMD w/o the full blown tilt-a-whirl show.</p><p></p><p>The rolling ball doesn't bother me though I prefer it right on the edge evah so slightly subdued. In fact I didn't care for the Zen Ray 7x36 because of the wide field combined w/healthy dose of PC. It showed what I referred to as the fountain effect. </p><p></p><p>Panning up a tree trunk the middle of the trunk "grew" and either side from center looked as water slowly breaking off a V-hull. The wide FOV gave me the illusion of the right side, still panning up the trunk, turning CW and left CCW. Whether trunk or foliage this upright vertical pan resembled a water fountain. Too confusing for me simple mind. Though I suspect distortion is the direct relation twixt FF & 400' FOV on an upscale 8X. I defer the final analogy to the experts.</p><p></p><p>I might not have explained correctly, but I know it when I see it. To date among modest bins the Kruger Caldera 8x42 provides me mild AMD w/just a touch of PC. Looking at the woods an upward vertical pan gives the illusion of the whole view tilting from top back towards me w/bottom pushed away. Coming down the bottom tilts towards me w/top pushed away.</p><p></p><p>It's one of the few 8X I own generally preferring higher magnification. Maybe a FF is somewhere in me future.</p><p></p><p>As always YMMV ...</p><p></p><p>ETA:</p><p></p><p>The 10x45 Opolyth Royal has more PC than the 10x40 Conquest. Vertical pan on an oak tree trunk, 4'-5' circumference at 15' nothing but trunk, the Conquest creates the illusion of a shallow depression. As if the lens pushed the trunk in a mite. I have to pan slow and concentrate coz at the same time I can lose sight of the indention & see the bark 'stretch'. </p><p></p><p>The Royal indention is a mite deeper and wider and I cannot duplicate the stretch at that short distance. At longer distance they both lose the indention and show a mild stretch. The PC is close to the same, yet different enough to notice.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Nixterdemus, post: 3597689, member: 96265"] I yearned for bins w/FF thinking they would be the end-all of glass. Nevah could save enough moolah, but I kept buying bins. Finally, it dawned on me that what I liked was little PC. To the point of seeing artifacts of AMD w/o the full blown tilt-a-whirl show. The rolling ball doesn't bother me though I prefer it right on the edge evah so slightly subdued. In fact I didn't care for the Zen Ray 7x36 because of the wide field combined w/healthy dose of PC. It showed what I referred to as the fountain effect. Panning up a tree trunk the middle of the trunk "grew" and either side from center looked as water slowly breaking off a V-hull. The wide FOV gave me the illusion of the right side, still panning up the trunk, turning CW and left CCW. Whether trunk or foliage this upright vertical pan resembled a water fountain. Too confusing for me simple mind. Though I suspect distortion is the direct relation twixt FF & 400' FOV on an upscale 8X. I defer the final analogy to the experts. I might not have explained correctly, but I know it when I see it. To date among modest bins the Kruger Caldera 8x42 provides me mild AMD w/just a touch of PC. Looking at the woods an upward vertical pan gives the illusion of the whole view tilting from top back towards me w/bottom pushed away. Coming down the bottom tilts towards me w/top pushed away. It's one of the few 8X I own generally preferring higher magnification. Maybe a FF is somewhere in me future. As always YMMV ... ETA: The 10x45 Opolyth Royal has more PC than the 10x40 Conquest. Vertical pan on an oak tree trunk, 4'-5' circumference at 15' nothing but trunk, the Conquest creates the illusion of a shallow depression. As if the lens pushed the trunk in a mite. I have to pan slow and concentrate coz at the same time I can lose sight of the indention & see the bark 'stretch'. The Royal indention is a mite deeper and wider and I cannot duplicate the stretch at that short distance. At longer distance they both lose the indention and show a mild stretch. The PC is close to the same, yet different enough to notice. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Binos with or without field flatteners
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top