What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Bins and scopes-myths and reality
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="postcardcv" data-source="post: 1311605" data-attributes="member: 3294"><p>Definitely and one more than one occassion, both with bins and scopes... the fine details and excellent colour redition of top optics can make a real difference in the real world, though in most situations you'd clinch the ID with mid-range gear. When it really stood out for me was seawatching, I was using a mid-price Opticron and my mate had the old grey Swaro. With birds at close range I was fine, but stuff further out I was struggling to get to species, I tried his scope and was able to ID birds at significantly greater range. For me seawatching is reason enough to own a top end ~80mm scope, they really prove their worth. It's worth noting that the Nikon ED78 is as good as teh newer ED82 so is up there with the top scopes. </p><p></p><p>All that said I do think that the cheaper/mid-price bins offer very good value. Opticron Oregon 8x32s at £99 are amazing value, and the new ED Hawke 8x43s (£280) are amazing (there are plenty of other sub £300 pair I could mention). But the top end still have an edge, it's just whether it's worth paying for. Personally I'd like to ID every bird I see, good optics give me the best chance of doing this.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="postcardcv, post: 1311605, member: 3294"] Definitely and one more than one occassion, both with bins and scopes... the fine details and excellent colour redition of top optics can make a real difference in the real world, though in most situations you'd clinch the ID with mid-range gear. When it really stood out for me was seawatching, I was using a mid-price Opticron and my mate had the old grey Swaro. With birds at close range I was fine, but stuff further out I was struggling to get to species, I tried his scope and was able to ID birds at significantly greater range. For me seawatching is reason enough to own a top end ~80mm scope, they really prove their worth. It's worth noting that the Nikon ED78 is as good as teh newer ED82 so is up there with the top scopes. All that said I do think that the cheaper/mid-price bins offer very good value. Opticron Oregon 8x32s at £99 are amazing value, and the new ED Hawke 8x43s (£280) are amazing (there are plenty of other sub £300 pair I could mention). But the top end still have an edge, it's just whether it's worth paying for. Personally I'd like to ID every bird I see, good optics give me the best chance of doing this. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Bins and scopes-myths and reality
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top