What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Leica
Bird or Bino?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Binastro" data-source="post: 3533251" data-attributes="member: 111403"><p>Re posts 28 and 37.</p><p></p><p>At least some of the 70 inch mirrors were I think made by Kodak. I think a price was mentioned.</p><p></p><p>I had read about the two larger ones gifted for astronomy.</p><p></p><p>Also someone got hold of a faulty large mirror and made his own observatory for it. I think the world's largest amateur scope.</p><p></p><p>Hubble was faulty from the start because of an elementary error that a good amateur would have spotted. If the launch had failed nobody would have known.</p><p></p><p>I have also seen a 14inch f/0.75 lens weighing about 350 lbs.</p><p></p><p>The Leica (Leitz) cross channel lens has been well described, but I forget where. Maybe 3,400mm focal length. The weather probably meant it wasn't that effective.</p><p></p><p>New telescopes up to 30 metre aperture cost up to billions.</p><p></p><p>There are other lenses not made public.</p><p></p><p>Million dollar lenses are fairly common.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Binastro, post: 3533251, member: 111403"] Re posts 28 and 37. At least some of the 70 inch mirrors were I think made by Kodak. I think a price was mentioned. I had read about the two larger ones gifted for astronomy. Also someone got hold of a faulty large mirror and made his own observatory for it. I think the world's largest amateur scope. Hubble was faulty from the start because of an elementary error that a good amateur would have spotted. If the launch had failed nobody would have known. I have also seen a 14inch f/0.75 lens weighing about 350 lbs. The Leica (Leitz) cross channel lens has been well described, but I forget where. Maybe 3,400mm focal length. The weather probably meant it wasn't that effective. New telescopes up to 30 metre aperture cost up to billions. There are other lenses not made public. Million dollar lenses are fairly common. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Leica
Bird or Bino?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top