What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Bird Identification Q&A
Bird seen at Cleeve Hill (Glos., UK) Today
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="deborah4" data-source="post: 1245582" data-attributes="member: 29880"><p><strong>Perhaps a couple of things worth mentioning:</strong></p><p></p><p>Birds are generally harder to ID from photos than in the field (as some of the more experienced birders have found when it comes to suggestions as to ID on the Forum!) - how much harder it must be for someone with less experience when they get home and try to wade through their shots! Thus, taking a guide book with you into the field is helpful for those newer to birding as is taking notes whilst viewing the bird as this improves observation skills.</p><p></p><p>Juvenile birds are always more tricky </p><p></p><p>Distant and fleeting glimpses in the field are not always adequate for an ID whatever level of experience - obviously the more experienced can ID more quickly but many birds will still go unidentified if views inadequate.</p><p></p><p>What may be a common bird in one location may be scarce in another so experience of individual species will fluctuate regardless. </p><p></p><p>There are members of several years standing who still post photos of very common birds up for ID - often the same species time and time again - however, there will always be other (newer/less experienced?) members keen to show/practice their ID skills by answering these threads and there will be others who will just ignore them after a while finding it slightly irritating. It doesn't matter a jot really, the bird gets ID'd, the responder is happy he got the ID right - everyone involved in the thread has got something out of it.</p><p></p><p>I do think I'd ask myself, if I were a relatively 'newbie birder' that if a certain member gave me the impression a photo I'd posted or others had posted was 'too easy' why the same member then failed to help me out with common gull species of different ages for example or 'odd' looking warblers!</p><p></p><p>It's all selective!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="deborah4, post: 1245582, member: 29880"] [B]Perhaps a couple of things worth mentioning:[/B] Birds are generally harder to ID from photos than in the field (as some of the more experienced birders have found when it comes to suggestions as to ID on the Forum!) - how much harder it must be for someone with less experience when they get home and try to wade through their shots! Thus, taking a guide book with you into the field is helpful for those newer to birding as is taking notes whilst viewing the bird as this improves observation skills. Juvenile birds are always more tricky Distant and fleeting glimpses in the field are not always adequate for an ID whatever level of experience - obviously the more experienced can ID more quickly but many birds will still go unidentified if views inadequate. What may be a common bird in one location may be scarce in another so experience of individual species will fluctuate regardless. There are members of several years standing who still post photos of very common birds up for ID - often the same species time and time again - however, there will always be other (newer/less experienced?) members keen to show/practice their ID skills by answering these threads and there will be others who will just ignore them after a while finding it slightly irritating. It doesn't matter a jot really, the bird gets ID'd, the responder is happy he got the ID right - everyone involved in the thread has got something out of it. I do think I'd ask myself, if I were a relatively 'newbie birder' that if a certain member gave me the impression a photo I'd posted or others had posted was 'too easy' why the same member then failed to help me out with common gull species of different ages for example or 'odd' looking warblers! It's all selective! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Bird Identification Q&A
Bird seen at Cleeve Hill (Glos., UK) Today
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top