What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Spotting Scopes & tripod/heads
Bird Watcher's Digest Mid-Price Scopes Review
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="henry link" data-source="post: 1497194" data-attributes="member: 6806"><p>Frank,</p><p></p><p>You don't need to compare it to another scope. Just measure the resolving power with the USAF chart and do an artificial star test. Those tests will show how close it comes to diffraction limited resolution, what aberrations are present and how severe they are. That's really almost all you need to know about the axial image quality.</p><p></p><p>But, if you want to compare it another 50mm scope, make a 50mm stopdown mask for your Pentax 65mm. </p><p></p><p>The fieldstop tends to blur in nearly all zoom eyepieces as the focal length of the eyepiece changes over the zoom range.</p><p></p><p>Henry</p><p></p><p>BTW, this scope actually had the lowest score for "image quality" in the Porters' inscrutable scoring system, even though its "resolution score @ 30x" was slightly better than the (probably defective) last place Minox. The Yukon's overall score was buoyed by what was judged to be a "superb" focus knob.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="henry link, post: 1497194, member: 6806"] Frank, You don't need to compare it to another scope. Just measure the resolving power with the USAF chart and do an artificial star test. Those tests will show how close it comes to diffraction limited resolution, what aberrations are present and how severe they are. That's really almost all you need to know about the axial image quality. But, if you want to compare it another 50mm scope, make a 50mm stopdown mask for your Pentax 65mm. The fieldstop tends to blur in nearly all zoom eyepieces as the focal length of the eyepiece changes over the zoom range. Henry BTW, this scope actually had the lowest score for "image quality" in the Porters' inscrutable scoring system, even though its "resolution score @ 30x" was slightly better than the (probably defective) last place Minox. The Yukon's overall score was buoyed by what was judged to be a "superb" focus knob. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Spotting Scopes & tripod/heads
Bird Watcher's Digest Mid-Price Scopes Review
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top