What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Spotting Scopes & tripod/heads
Bird Watcher's Digest Mid-Price Scopes Review
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RAH" data-source="post: 1497293" data-attributes="member: 5834"><p>I think that this is an error in the chart. If you read the text of review, in the Minox section they say that the MINOX had the lowest "image quality" score of 2.9. So, in other words, I think that the chart has the IQ score of the Yukon and Minox reversed. Thus, the Yukon had the higher IQ as well as the higher resolution.</p><p></p><p>As far as the Minox being defective, my cousin has one. The image you see thru it is adequate for the money. But the focus ring is quite stiff, although she is able to use it without causing the scope shift, because a small turn makes a fairly large difference. In other words, my experience with the scope pretty much matches the magazine review. This fact encouraged me to buy the Yukon, because I know how the Minox behaves, and if the Yukon behaves at least that well, it is a great deal for $80 and I can certainly use it.</p><p></p><p>I haven't received it yet - estimated delivery is next Tuesday :-( - but when I do I will let folks know how it is.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RAH, post: 1497293, member: 5834"] I think that this is an error in the chart. If you read the text of review, in the Minox section they say that the MINOX had the lowest "image quality" score of 2.9. So, in other words, I think that the chart has the IQ score of the Yukon and Minox reversed. Thus, the Yukon had the higher IQ as well as the higher resolution. As far as the Minox being defective, my cousin has one. The image you see thru it is adequate for the money. But the focus ring is quite stiff, although she is able to use it without causing the scope shift, because a small turn makes a fairly large difference. In other words, my experience with the scope pretty much matches the magazine review. This fact encouraged me to buy the Yukon, because I know how the Minox behaves, and if the Yukon behaves at least that well, it is a great deal for $80 and I can certainly use it. I haven't received it yet - estimated delivery is next Tuesday :-( - but when I do I will let folks know how it is. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Spotting Scopes & tripod/heads
Bird Watcher's Digest Mid-Price Scopes Review
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top