What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Spotting Scopes & tripod/heads
Bird Watcher's Digest Mid-Price Scopes Review
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="FrankD" data-source="post: 1497624" data-attributes="member: 18544"><p>FWIW, I received the 20x50 Yukon Firefall today.</p><p></p><p>It came in a shrink-wrapped package.</p><p></p><p>Positives:</p><p></p><p>It is very small and very light.</p><p></p><p>It is very inexpensive.</p><p></p><p>The image at 20x is very wide....170-some feet by the listed specs.</p><p></p><p>Negatives:</p><p></p><p>Eye relief is short.</p><p></p><p>...and if I thought the 12-36x50 wasn't as sharp as I would like then the 20x50 definitely is not as well. In fact after comparing the 12-36 to the fixed 20x I would most certainly say the 12-36 is noticeably sharper at all magnifications. It also appears to be marginally brighter at an approximate 20x setting. Fit and finish seem about equal with the focusing tension and overall feel going to the 12-36x.</p><p></p><p>I also received the 15-45x65 Promaster Elite ELX ED spotting scope as well. This is an interesting scope in that it does accept the standard 1.25 inch astro eyepieces just like the Pentax. However, there isn't a locking collar with the Promaster. The eyepieces just slide into the scope body with no way to lock them in place (maybe some type of external adaptor?). This wouldn't be an issue if you are just keeping the scope stationary but if you plan to pick up and move it around then you are going to have problems.</p><p></p><p>Color fringing seems well enough controlled though there seems to be more field curvature with both the provided 15-45x eyepiece and the Pentax XW 20. The latter I find interesting as I was under the impression that the eyepiece pretty much determined this type of image characteristic....?</p><p></p><p>More to follow.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="FrankD, post: 1497624, member: 18544"] FWIW, I received the 20x50 Yukon Firefall today. It came in a shrink-wrapped package. Positives: It is very small and very light. It is very inexpensive. The image at 20x is very wide....170-some feet by the listed specs. Negatives: Eye relief is short. ...and if I thought the 12-36x50 wasn't as sharp as I would like then the 20x50 definitely is not as well. In fact after comparing the 12-36 to the fixed 20x I would most certainly say the 12-36 is noticeably sharper at all magnifications. It also appears to be marginally brighter at an approximate 20x setting. Fit and finish seem about equal with the focusing tension and overall feel going to the 12-36x. I also received the 15-45x65 Promaster Elite ELX ED spotting scope as well. This is an interesting scope in that it does accept the standard 1.25 inch astro eyepieces just like the Pentax. However, there isn't a locking collar with the Promaster. The eyepieces just slide into the scope body with no way to lock them in place (maybe some type of external adaptor?). This wouldn't be an issue if you are just keeping the scope stationary but if you plan to pick up and move it around then you are going to have problems. Color fringing seems well enough controlled though there seems to be more field curvature with both the provided 15-45x eyepiece and the Pentax XW 20. The latter I find interesting as I was under the impression that the eyepiece pretty much determined this type of image characteristic....? More to follow. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Spotting Scopes & tripod/heads
Bird Watcher's Digest Mid-Price Scopes Review
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top