What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Birds & Birding
Birdguides photos
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="James Thomas" data-source="post: 1703166" data-attributes="member: 41555"><p>Wasn't being critical of anyone uploading any picture. </p><p></p><p>As commented above the volume of photos is what I like about the site, often some of the stranger angles of "lesser" pictures are ideal for assisting with identifications so may be of great use.</p><p></p><p>Unfortunately the thread got sidetracked but the point I was going to make once debate was opened was that not enough thumbs up are being cast meaning that any sycophancy/cliquey behaviour can suggest that picture A is better than picture B when that is patently untrue. The best way to stop this would be for the volume of votes cast to increase significantly and to make such occurences pointless.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="James Thomas, post: 1703166, member: 41555"] Wasn't being critical of anyone uploading any picture. As commented above the volume of photos is what I like about the site, often some of the stranger angles of "lesser" pictures are ideal for assisting with identifications so may be of great use. Unfortunately the thread got sidetracked but the point I was going to make once debate was opened was that not enough thumbs up are being cast meaning that any sycophancy/cliquey behaviour can suggest that picture A is better than picture B when that is patently untrue. The best way to stop this would be for the volume of votes cast to increase significantly and to make such occurences pointless. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Birds & Birding
Birdguides photos
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top