What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Birding camera required
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RAH" data-source="post: 1214958" data-attributes="member: 5834"><p>I second this recommendation. Especially now because the E-510 can be had for a low price, since it has been replaced by the E-520, due in stores in July or August. That said, you might look at the E-520 and decide that its enhancements are worth the extra money. It is still reasonably priced.</p><p></p><p>One advantage of the Olympus 4:3 DSLRs is that the somewhat smaller sensor has a 2x "crop-factor" - any lens gives the equivalent of 2x the reach of the same lens on a film SLR. So, as mentioned, the Oly 70-300 (about $350) gives the equivalent of 140-600. Not only does this mean that the lens is smaller and lighter, but also cheaper - i.e. a zoom lens that only goes up to 300 is usually cheaper and lighter than a lens that goes to 400 or 500, which you would need on a 1.5x or 1.6 system to give 600mm equivalent.</p><p></p><p>The downside to the somewhat smaller sensor is the potential for more noise at high ISOs. However, if you read the reviews of the E-510, you sill see that it stands up quite well to comparisons against other DSLRs.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RAH, post: 1214958, member: 5834"] I second this recommendation. Especially now because the E-510 can be had for a low price, since it has been replaced by the E-520, due in stores in July or August. That said, you might look at the E-520 and decide that its enhancements are worth the extra money. It is still reasonably priced. One advantage of the Olympus 4:3 DSLRs is that the somewhat smaller sensor has a 2x "crop-factor" - any lens gives the equivalent of 2x the reach of the same lens on a film SLR. So, as mentioned, the Oly 70-300 (about $350) gives the equivalent of 140-600. Not only does this mean that the lens is smaller and lighter, but also cheaper - i.e. a zoom lens that only goes up to 300 is usually cheaper and lighter than a lens that goes to 400 or 500, which you would need on a 1.5x or 1.6 system to give 600mm equivalent. The downside to the somewhat smaller sensor is the potential for more noise at high ISOs. However, if you read the reviews of the E-510, you sill see that it stands up quite well to comparisons against other DSLRs. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Birding camera required
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top