What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Conservation
BirdLife [Malta] report reveals increased levels of illegal hunting
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Nightranger" data-source="post: 1315120" data-attributes="member: 64473"><p>This is the single most key phrase in all this debate and is central to everything that is wrong with the Malta situation. I hope it comes as no surprise to everyone here that just about every Mediterranean country has issues about bird hunting (the RSPB have an excellent pack that is well worth a read if you get in touch through the usual channels). However, the major difference is that all the other situations are problematic in having a low police presence in the areas where the shooting/trapping is taking place. It is slightly analogous to the raptor persecution here in that there is the process in place to deal with the problem, including the appropriate laws and the policitical will. The downside is that we are talking about areas much larger and less populated than Malta with a correspondingly lower police presence. Gallina probably still thinks that this is evidence that Malta is being unfairly treated but the reality is that the Maltese government agreed on a five year grace period to implement it EU Bird Directive changes when it applied to join the EU. Lo and behold, when the five year period was ending people like Gallina came out of the woodwork to promote jingoism and the hunters stepped up their appalling environmental vandalism. To me, this seemed entirely predictable and I am sure there were many people who knew that there was never any chance that Malta was going to honour its promise. OK, we can expect that from individuals, as is happening with the fox hunting (with hounds, before anyone takes issue fox control is and always has been legal) here but it is a different prospect when the national government chooses to ignore or re-negotiate its very own promises.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Nightranger, post: 1315120, member: 64473"] This is the single most key phrase in all this debate and is central to everything that is wrong with the Malta situation. I hope it comes as no surprise to everyone here that just about every Mediterranean country has issues about bird hunting (the RSPB have an excellent pack that is well worth a read if you get in touch through the usual channels). However, the major difference is that all the other situations are problematic in having a low police presence in the areas where the shooting/trapping is taking place. It is slightly analogous to the raptor persecution here in that there is the process in place to deal with the problem, including the appropriate laws and the policitical will. The downside is that we are talking about areas much larger and less populated than Malta with a correspondingly lower police presence. Gallina probably still thinks that this is evidence that Malta is being unfairly treated but the reality is that the Maltese government agreed on a five year grace period to implement it EU Bird Directive changes when it applied to join the EU. Lo and behold, when the five year period was ending people like Gallina came out of the woodwork to promote jingoism and the hunters stepped up their appalling environmental vandalism. To me, this seemed entirely predictable and I am sure there were many people who knew that there was never any chance that Malta was going to honour its promise. OK, we can expect that from individuals, as is happening with the fox hunting (with hounds, before anyone takes issue fox control is and always has been legal) here but it is a different prospect when the national government chooses to ignore or re-negotiate its very own promises. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Conservation
BirdLife [Malta] report reveals increased levels of illegal hunting
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top