Tranquility Base said:
IMHO poetry and literature are meant to be read, reflected upon and possibly enjoyed. Not dissected. Everyone's response to a piece of poetry is individual: attempting to 'educate' other people about why you liked it is as futile as explaining why you enjoyed a joke that no-one else 'got'!
Sharing a piece of poetry (or a piece of art / music / memory / story) well that's different! (IMHO!)
Partly, I agree; but partly I don't! Some poetry is so dense in its meaning that some help with how those meanings are developed can 'open it up'. Here's a poem by Larkin - none too dense in its meanings - but I know many A-level students struggle with until it is 'dissected' and explained, after which, I'd say that many come to enjoy it and will never forget it:
MCMXIV
Those long uneven lines
Standing as patiently
As if they were stretched outside
The Oval or Villa Park,
The crowns of hats, the sun
On moustached archaic faces
Grinning as if it were all
An August Bank Holiday lark;
And the shut shops, the bleached
Established names on the sunblinds,
The farthings and sovereigns,
And dark-clothed children at play
Called after kings and queens,
The tin advertisements
For cocoa and twist, and the pubs
Wide open all day;
And the countryside not caring
The place-names all hazed over
With flowering grasses, and fields
Shadowing Domesday lines
Under wheat’s restless silence;
The differently-dressed servants
With tiny rooms in huge houses,
The dust behind limousines;
Never such innocence,
Never before or since,
As changed itself to past
Without a word – the men
Leaving the gardens tidy,
The thousands of marriages
Lasting a little while longer:
Never such innocence again.
Philip Larkin