What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
Birds of paradise
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="sicklebill" data-source="post: 3584511" data-attributes="member: 33954"><p>I had anticipated this split, the females of this species in the Arfaks are just so different to the central and eastern birds, if species were described on female plumages then it would have been obvious-see parallels with whistlers and wheatears where highly distinct females were likewise not considered for species delimitation.</p><p>My new field guide has this note:</p><p><em>Male distinctive. Female-plumaged birds resemble parotias, but Carola’s has pale eye and forehead; E sub- species told from Magnificent Bird-of-paradise and Lawes’s Parotia female plumages by superciliary stripe, W NG subspecies with dark head told from Western Parotia by longer bill, paler less chestnut plumage, paler underparts, lack of blue eye. TN Genetic work on the three subspecies groups required, as there are quite marked vocal differences among them, as well as strikingly distinct female plumages, with minor poorly known (and sphinx virtually unknown). W birds, at least, seem good candidates for a split.</em></p><p>I will be interested to see how they delimit the new subspecies, and how different it is.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="sicklebill, post: 3584511, member: 33954"] I had anticipated this split, the females of this species in the Arfaks are just so different to the central and eastern birds, if species were described on female plumages then it would have been obvious-see parallels with whistlers and wheatears where highly distinct females were likewise not considered for species delimitation. My new field guide has this note: [I]Male distinctive. Female-plumaged birds resemble parotias, but Carola’s has pale eye and forehead; E sub- species told from Magnificent Bird-of-paradise and Lawes’s Parotia female plumages by superciliary stripe, W NG subspecies with dark head told from Western Parotia by longer bill, paler less chestnut plumage, paler underparts, lack of blue eye. TN Genetic work on the three subspecies groups required, as there are quite marked vocal differences among them, as well as strikingly distinct female plumages, with minor poorly known (and sphinx virtually unknown). W birds, at least, seem good candidates for a split.[/I] I will be interested to see how they delimit the new subspecies, and how different it is. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
Birds of paradise
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top