BF Newsroom
Well-known member
A couple start the first leg of their world trip in an attempt to see a record number of birds in a year.
More from BBC News...
More from BBC News...
your not wrong there twite although i must comment i dont what would take the most balls on my behalf- selling the house and packing up work or stepping on a plane for the first time ever. i think it may be the plane
..oh and a house to sell!
Good for them. They've got a website up, too: Biggest Twitch
I must be a terrible cynic, the first thought to strike me after reading this was they're going to produce one mother of a carbon footprint on this trip.
Would it be any worse than staying at home, running a house (with heating, lighting, etc), transport to and from work and so on?
Also it's in a good cause, they are raising money for Mindo Cloudforest Foundation
Mind you they have managed to blag themselves gear from Swarovski and Country Innovation. Not bad.
This pair's carbon emissions are going to be enormous, just exactly the opposite of what conservationists should be aspiring to. .
I'm probably going to be put down for this... and I'm not trying be funny, but any flights they are planning to take will go ahead whether they are on them or not.
Twite.
Well... the same goes for everybody who flies down to the Med for their holidays. All those individuals choosing to fly creates the demand for more flights. It's trite but really, in terms of aviation's influence on climate change, we're part of the solution or part of the problem, and the choice is our own.
I just really cannot understand how a charity effort in aid of conservation could possibly have as large an environmental impact as this sort of journey surely must. It baffles me. Short of building a coal fired power station in your garden, world travel is about the worst, i.e. least environmentally sustainable, thing you can do - even if you believe in flimflam like carbon offsetting.
any figures to back this up?
Rob