What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
BLI recognised Loxia scotia no longer as species
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="njlarsen" data-source="post: 1601351" data-attributes="member: 7427"><p>whether something is oversplit or undersplit to my mind is a question of two things: personal preference and species concept. I read earlier today the introduction to AOU checklist no 7 (I think it was) where the authors pointed out the difference in interpretation that they used compared to authors of earlier versions: if there was a narrow, stable hybridization zone, earlier authors had interpreted that as evidence against two species according to the biological species concept, because their predecessors had felt that any hybridization was sign of gene flow; for this group, the same observation would indicate evidence <strong>for</strong> two species, because a narrow hybrid zone was interpreted as an essential barrier to gene flow. Their predecessors had required an absolute barrier (no hybridization what so ever which would indicate that there would be only one species of ducks in the world (my exaggerated example, not theirs)). </p><p></p><p>Cheers</p><p>Niels</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="njlarsen, post: 1601351, member: 7427"] whether something is oversplit or undersplit to my mind is a question of two things: personal preference and species concept. I read earlier today the introduction to AOU checklist no 7 (I think it was) where the authors pointed out the difference in interpretation that they used compared to authors of earlier versions: if there was a narrow, stable hybridization zone, earlier authors had interpreted that as evidence against two species according to the biological species concept, because their predecessors had felt that any hybridization was sign of gene flow; for this group, the same observation would indicate evidence [B]for[/B] two species, because a narrow hybrid zone was interpreted as an essential barrier to gene flow. Their predecessors had required an absolute barrier (no hybridization what so ever which would indicate that there would be only one species of ducks in the world (my exaggerated example, not theirs)). Cheers Niels [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
BLI recognised Loxia scotia no longer as species
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top