What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
BLI recognised Loxia scotia no longer as species
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mysticete" data-source="post: 1605679" data-attributes="member: 67784"><p>With the caveat that I am not a geneticist:</p><p></p><p>Genetic distance is useful, but is relative and can't really be used as and independent scale, since some groups do seem to evolve faster than others, and so might accumulate genetic differences faster. It's probably useful, for say comparing a single family of continental birds, but probably not useful otherwise.</p><p></p><p>AFAIK someone did publish a classification scheme based solely on genetic distance (I have the paper...somewhere). However you get hilarious results like recognizing Drosophila as a linnean order, while most bird families would be reduced to one species, or something like that.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mysticete, post: 1605679, member: 67784"] With the caveat that I am not a geneticist: Genetic distance is useful, but is relative and can't really be used as and independent scale, since some groups do seem to evolve faster than others, and so might accumulate genetic differences faster. It's probably useful, for say comparing a single family of continental birds, but probably not useful otherwise. AFAIK someone did publish a classification scheme based solely on genetic distance (I have the paper...somewhere). However you get hilarious results like recognizing Drosophila as a linnean order, while most bird families would be reduced to one species, or something like that. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
BLI recognised Loxia scotia no longer as species
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top