What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Birds & Birding
Blue-winged Teal...shot...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Farnboro John" data-source="post: 1654209" data-attributes="member: 36432"><p>This rang a bell with me so I went back to the primary legislation for UK: that is, the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981. This has been amended to take account of CROW and devolution but remains essentially intact. I make no comment on the situation in Eire as I do not know what covers it.</p><p></p><p>In UK it is quite clear. Schedule 2 part 1 contains the list of quarry species. In the original Act the wildfowl part of this was:</p><p></p><p>Duck, Tufted</p><p>Gadwall</p><p>Goldeneye</p><p>Canada Goose</p><p>Greylag Goose</p><p>Pinkfooted Goose</p><p>Whitefronted Goose (in England and Wales)</p><p>Mallard</p><p>Pintail</p><p>Pochard</p><p>Shoveler</p><p>Teal </p><p>Wigeon</p><p></p><p>And then only outside the close season. The quarry list has been amended since then e.g. Brent Goose is an absentee from the original list that is now quarry.</p><p></p><p>However, other wildfowl on the British List including all vagrants, have the general protection afforded to Robins, Wrens etc - that is to say, it is illegal to kill them. This would include non-vagrant species such as Smew (which might be mistaken for female Goldeneye except with knowledge and a clear view) and Garganey. </p><p></p><p>Shooters are required to make a positive identification to remain within the law. Shooting any non-quarry wildfowl species by accident is an offence, just as a photographer would be unable to claim his disturbance of a Schedule 1 species was due to ignorance of what it was.</p><p></p><p>Amen</p><p></p><p>John</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Farnboro John, post: 1654209, member: 36432"] This rang a bell with me so I went back to the primary legislation for UK: that is, the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981. This has been amended to take account of CROW and devolution but remains essentially intact. I make no comment on the situation in Eire as I do not know what covers it. In UK it is quite clear. Schedule 2 part 1 contains the list of quarry species. In the original Act the wildfowl part of this was: Duck, Tufted Gadwall Goldeneye Canada Goose Greylag Goose Pinkfooted Goose Whitefronted Goose (in England and Wales) Mallard Pintail Pochard Shoveler Teal Wigeon And then only outside the close season. The quarry list has been amended since then e.g. Brent Goose is an absentee from the original list that is now quarry. However, other wildfowl on the British List including all vagrants, have the general protection afforded to Robins, Wrens etc - that is to say, it is illegal to kill them. This would include non-vagrant species such as Smew (which might be mistaken for female Goldeneye except with knowledge and a clear view) and Garganey. Shooters are required to make a positive identification to remain within the law. Shooting any non-quarry wildfowl species by accident is an offence, just as a photographer would be unable to claim his disturbance of a Schedule 1 species was due to ignorance of what it was. Amen John [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Birds & Birding
Blue-winged Teal...shot...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top