• BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is absolutely FREE!

    Register for an account to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.

Bone microstructure of Vegavis iaai (1 Viewer)

Fred Ruhe

Well-known member
Jordi Alexis Garcia Marsà, Federico L. Agnolín & Fernando Novas, 2017

Bone microstructure of Vegavis iaai (Aves, Anseriformes) from the Upper Cretaceous of Vega Island, Antarctic Peninsula

Historical Biology, Latest Articles
Pages 1-5 | Received 09 Feb 2017, Accepted 26 Jun 2017, Published online: 11 Jul 2017

Abstract: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08912963.2017.1348503

Vegavis iaai is a neornithine bird coming from the Late Cretaceous Sandwich Bluff Member of the López de Bertodano Formation (Maastrichtian), Antarctic Peninsula. Vegavis constitutes the only unquestionable Cretaceous neornithine bird, and is known by the holotype and specimen MACN-PV 19.748. The goal of this paper is to present a detailed osteohistological analysis of V. iaai. Vegavis shows a highly vascularized fibrolamellar matrix lacking lines of arrested growths, features widespread among modern birds. This is consistent with previous hypotheses indicating that modern birds were dominant at high latitudes. This is probably related to high-metabolic rates shared by modern birds, whereas archaic taxa as Enantiornithes are absent or form a minority part of High-Latitude bird assemblages. Vegavis was a diver, characterised by a certain degree of limb osteosclerosis, with an increase of bone inner compactness, and inhibition of secondary remodelling, with no effect on the external dimensions of the bone, a combination of characters related to diving lifestyle. Based on Relative Bone Thickness it is possible to infer that Vegavis was a foot-propelled diving bird, similar to some extant anseriforms. Occurrence of osteosclerotic limb bones in Vegavis and Polarornis may constitute a derived shared feature, sustaining the hypothesis that both taxa are phylogenetically related.


Warning! This thread is more than 5 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread