What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Bird Identification Q&A
BOP seen this morning NE.London....?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KenM" data-source="post: 3567381" data-attributes="member: 57880"><p>Well clearly Mick was not confused......?</p><p></p><p>I've replaced the 2nd image in post 42 (as it was not the intended image, my mistake...apologies, they all look similar when viewed as thumbnails) and taken out the Kestrel (3rd image), and have substituted it with an HB shot taken in Aug.'13. showing perhaps a shorter tail for HB? albeit this bird was migrating in a continuous level, flap, flap, glide. I don't know if when in this flight mode, a degree of tail compression is employed (less resistance for sustained flight?) Clearly the ''moving parts'' are not set in stone, which is very much a feature of BOPS...as we all know...or should? However on balance, to reiterate it would appear that consensually (posts...almost), support a feeling that it looked odd? (as compared to the lifetime of CB's that I've experienced). I had the advantage of seeing it with the naked eye somewhat closer than the resulting images show. Of course I could have wished for better images, unfortunately there aren't any, much to my disappointment. </p><p></p><p>Cheers</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KenM, post: 3567381, member: 57880"] Well clearly Mick was not confused......? I've replaced the 2nd image in post 42 (as it was not the intended image, my mistake...apologies, they all look similar when viewed as thumbnails) and taken out the Kestrel (3rd image), and have substituted it with an HB shot taken in Aug.'13. showing perhaps a shorter tail for HB? albeit this bird was migrating in a continuous level, flap, flap, glide. I don't know if when in this flight mode, a degree of tail compression is employed (less resistance for sustained flight?) Clearly the ''moving parts'' are not set in stone, which is very much a feature of BOPS...as we all know...or should? However on balance, to reiterate it would appear that consensually (posts...almost), support a feeling that it looked odd? (as compared to the lifetime of CB's that I've experienced). I had the advantage of seeing it with the naked eye somewhat closer than the resulting images show. Of course I could have wished for better images, unfortunately there aren't any, much to my disappointment. Cheers [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Bird Identification Q&A
BOP seen this morning NE.London....?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top