What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Bird Identification Q&A
Bop Uk
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RecoveringScot" data-source="post: 3384752" data-attributes="member: 17473"><p>I don't agree the pic is useless. It's given me well over an hour of ferreting fun. A better use I cannot think of. I suspect though that there are two kinds of people: those who can bear uncertainty, and those who can't.</p><p></p><p>The Peterson Guide used to carry silhouettes of raptors in the correct belief that they would be at a minimum helpful for IDing raptors. I think that is one reason the quality of the shot doesn't bother me. But I don't really think the correct ID is that important in the end. If a thing's worth doing, it's worth doing badly. One needs the courage to shout out what may be a wrong conclusion, and the humility to accept a correction (which I eagerly await). That's the whole point.</p><p></p><p>It would be dull if all photos were crisp and clear. In fact that would take away most of the pleasure in the exercise to my mind.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RecoveringScot, post: 3384752, member: 17473"] I don't agree the pic is useless. It's given me well over an hour of ferreting fun. A better use I cannot think of. I suspect though that there are two kinds of people: those who can bear uncertainty, and those who can't. The Peterson Guide used to carry silhouettes of raptors in the correct belief that they would be at a minimum helpful for IDing raptors. I think that is one reason the quality of the shot doesn't bother me. But I don't really think the correct ID is that important in the end. If a thing's worth doing, it's worth doing badly. One needs the courage to shout out what may be a wrong conclusion, and the humility to accept a correction (which I eagerly await). That's the whole point. It would be dull if all photos were crisp and clear. In fact that would take away most of the pleasure in the exercise to my mind. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Bird Identification Q&A
Bop Uk
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top