What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
BOU TSC disbanded
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mb1848" data-source="post: 3311764" data-attributes="member: 31036"><p>This thread is very interesting but confusing without a scorecard. I thought the sub-committee was only in existence for a short while. I found out that the British List Sub-Committee responsible for the Check-List was dissolved in December 1952, and was replaced a year later by two new B . O . U . Sub-Committees with limited terms of reference. The first was a British Records Sub-Committee to advise on the authenticity of records of species or races proposed for inclusion in the British List, under the chairmanship of Mr. A. W . Boyd. The second was a Taxonomic Sub-Committee, to advise on taxonomic questions.. (Ibis 1956) In 1999 members went up from 3 to 6 and 2002 started publishing reports. So what, the question becomes is there anything to do? I think suing is a dead end. But! </p><p>BOU rules: <a href="http://www.bou.org.uk/BOU-Rules-2010.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.bou.org.uk/BOU-Rules-2010.pdf</a> .</p><p>10. 2. The notice must specify the date, time and place of the meeting and the general nature of the business to be transacted.</p><p>14. Procedures and Voting at General Meetings (1) Only the business for which a meeting has been convened, as detailed on the notice, will be discussed. </p><p>If the deletion of the TSC was not on the Notice? </p><p>9. General Meetings. 5. The Trustees (trustees are elected council members) must call a special general meeting if asked for by at least 50 members in writing. So a lister and 49 of his/her friends should join the BOU and ask for a meeting on reconstituting the TSC. </p><p>If that seems unlikely. I wonder if bird forumers could put themselves in the place of 12 Phd’s who just voted to terminate the TSC and are being made fun of by people who do not have even a masters degree on the internets. What list should the BOU pick? And please show your work, and give reasons why. Armchair ticks is a good reason I think. Here is a list of lists from the IOC website: </p><p><a href="http://www.internationalornithology.org/birdlist.html" target="_blank">http://www.internationalornithology.org/birdlist.html</a> .</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mb1848, post: 3311764, member: 31036"] This thread is very interesting but confusing without a scorecard. I thought the sub-committee was only in existence for a short while. I found out that the British List Sub-Committee responsible for the Check-List was dissolved in December 1952, and was replaced a year later by two new B . O . U . Sub-Committees with limited terms of reference. The first was a British Records Sub-Committee to advise on the authenticity of records of species or races proposed for inclusion in the British List, under the chairmanship of Mr. A. W . Boyd. The second was a Taxonomic Sub-Committee, to advise on taxonomic questions.. (Ibis 1956) In 1999 members went up from 3 to 6 and 2002 started publishing reports. So what, the question becomes is there anything to do? I think suing is a dead end. But! BOU rules: [url]http://www.bou.org.uk/BOU-Rules-2010.pdf[/url] . 10. 2. The notice must specify the date, time and place of the meeting and the general nature of the business to be transacted. 14. Procedures and Voting at General Meetings (1) Only the business for which a meeting has been convened, as detailed on the notice, will be discussed. If the deletion of the TSC was not on the Notice? 9. General Meetings. 5. The Trustees (trustees are elected council members) must call a special general meeting if asked for by at least 50 members in writing. So a lister and 49 of his/her friends should join the BOU and ask for a meeting on reconstituting the TSC. If that seems unlikely. I wonder if bird forumers could put themselves in the place of 12 Phd’s who just voted to terminate the TSC and are being made fun of by people who do not have even a masters degree on the internets. What list should the BOU pick? And please show your work, and give reasons why. Armchair ticks is a good reason I think. Here is a list of lists from the IOC website: [url]http://www.internationalornithology.org/birdlist.html[/url] . [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
BOU TSC disbanded
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top