What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
BOURC TSC 5th report
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="l_raty" data-source="post: 1314854" data-attributes="member: 24811"><p>I was a bit intrigued by this remark in the report:</p><p>"Wink et al. (2002. <em>Charadrius</em> 38: 239–245) found no sequence differences between Black-throated and Pacific Loons, and low variation in general among the loons; however, Brown et al. (2008. <em>BMC Biology</em> 6: 6) reported (unexpectedly) that <em>arctica</em> and <em>pacifica</em> are not sister taxa, based on phylogenetic analysis of 4594 bp of mtDNA."</p><p>(For any interested soul, Wink et al. (2002) can be accessed here: <a href="http://www.uni-heidelberg.de/institute/fak14/ipmb/phazb/pdf-files/2002%20Pdf.Pubwink/26.2002.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.uni-heidelberg.de/institute/fak14/ipmb/phazb/pdf-files/2002 Pdf.Pubwink/26.2002.pdf</a>, and Brown et al. (2008) is here: <a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7007/6/6" target="_blank">http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7007/6/6</a>)</p><p></p><p>Had a slightly closer look at the data, and ended up with what follows... The <em>Gavia stellata</em> sequence in Wink et al. 2002, based on what they give in their Tab. 2 (p. 242), is directly contradicted by three congruent cytochrome b sequences deposited in GenBank by three different authors (Stanley & Harrison 1999: AF158250; Slack et al. 2006: NC_007007; Brown et al. 2008: EU166996). These three sequences are significantly more divergent from other <em>Gavia</em> spp. than what Wink et al. suggest (8-9%, vs. 4-5%), thus the "low variation in general among the loons" that they found is almost certainly an underestimation. The Wink et al. "<em>stellata</em>" sequence is fully congruent with one sequence deposited in GenBank, labelled as <em>G. arctica</em> (García-Moreno et al. 2003: AY139635 - this is one of the sequences used by Brown et al.)...</p><p></p><p>L -</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="l_raty, post: 1314854, member: 24811"] I was a bit intrigued by this remark in the report: "Wink et al. (2002. [I]Charadrius[/I] 38: 239–245) found no sequence differences between Black-throated and Pacific Loons, and low variation in general among the loons; however, Brown et al. (2008. [I]BMC Biology[/I] 6: 6) reported (unexpectedly) that [I]arctica[/I] and [I]pacifica[/I] are not sister taxa, based on phylogenetic analysis of 4594 bp of mtDNA." (For any interested soul, Wink et al. (2002) can be accessed here: [url]http://www.uni-heidelberg.de/institute/fak14/ipmb/phazb/pdf-files/2002%20Pdf.Pubwink/26.2002.pdf[/url], and Brown et al. (2008) is here: [url]http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7007/6/6[/url]) Had a slightly closer look at the data, and ended up with what follows... The [I]Gavia stellata[/I] sequence in Wink et al. 2002, based on what they give in their Tab. 2 (p. 242), is directly contradicted by three congruent cytochrome b sequences deposited in GenBank by three different authors (Stanley & Harrison 1999: AF158250; Slack et al. 2006: NC_007007; Brown et al. 2008: EU166996). These three sequences are significantly more divergent from other [I]Gavia[/I] spp. than what Wink et al. suggest (8-9%, vs. 4-5%), thus the "low variation in general among the loons" that they found is almost certainly an underestimation. The Wink et al. "[I]stellata[/I]" sequence is fully congruent with one sequence deposited in GenBank, labelled as [I]G. arctica[/I] (García-Moreno et al. 2003: AY139635 - this is one of the sequences used by Brown et al.)... L - [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
BOURC TSC 5th report
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top