BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is absolutely FREE!

Register for an account to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="pduxon" data-source="post: 1277079" data-attributes="member: 1157">curiously the 400 5.6 never tempted me, no shake reduction, if it had it...... but I'd like Af-s in the 80-400 and VR on the 300! if Nikon release one of those or a 400 5.6 prime with VR ! your last comment I totally agree with. I can't understand why everytime there is an xxd you canon guys go bananas over it and want to buy it. and the nikon people who are suddenly wanting to get d700's instead of d300. Oh back to lenses I suddenly realised what I'd really like. if you want a lens going out to 400/500 you are more interested in the maximum length right? so instead of Canon and Nikon mucking about with 100-400/80-400 how about a 200-400 constant f5.6 with IS/VR USM/AF-s??? i'll accept similar build quality to what we have now.</blockquote>