Really out my depth here so hoping John Allcock will pick up on this thread and add something more constructive.
Thanks Grahame. I actually started posting something yesterday, but got a bit confused and wanted to come back today for a fresh look. It's an intriguing bird. I should point out that I have no experience of Japanese, so I'm going on comparison of Brownish-flanked and Manchurian, as these are the more likely species at the location.
My immediate instinct on this bird is that it's not a Manchurian - as Andy mentioned above, the supercilium is quite weak and it does not have much rufous tone. Overall I thought it looked more like a Brownish-flanked, apart from the confusing wing formula.
In terms of call, I have occasionally heard variation from both BfBW and MBW, which can be very confusing. When I've heard this, it's usually been a single-note call, rather than the usual rattle (MBW) or double-click (BfBW). Male and female birds also seem to have subtly different calls, which can be confusing if you are more familiar with one.
So that was my opinion yesterday, but looking a bit more closely now I think I might change my opinion from that first impression. There is quite an obvious dark eyestripe, especially on the first image, which I would expect on MBW but not BfBW. The posture, with slightly drooping wings and slightly cocked tail, looks wrong for BfBW, more like I would expect for MBW.
And looking carefully at the photo this evening, I think that the forecrown
is slightly more rufous than the rest of the crown, with a similar pattern to MBW, although this is less obvious than expected. I think this may be a bit less obvious on the photos due to the light conditions. xuky, I hope you don't mind that I've tried adjusting the colour tones on a couple of your photos to see how that affects my perception. Suddenly the bird looks a lot more like a Manchurian to me, not only the crown pattern but also the upperpart tone.
So, on balance, I think that this is probably a dull Manchurian BW, probably female based on the apparent size. I'm not 100% sure though, so if anyone has further comment I'd be interested to hear.