What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Bushnell - Bausch & Lomb
Bushnell 8x42 Legend Porro or Yosemite 8x30 ?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kevin Purcell" data-source="post: 1375025" data-attributes="member: 68323"><p>With all the rain here it's difficult to test bins outside but I went out in the wind and drizzle (fun!) today.</p><p></p><p>The Legend 8x42 porros look very good. </p><p></p><p>Very good value for money and as has been said (by FrankD) a notch optically above the Ultima DX mostly from the reduced field curvature -- I haven't ABed them yet. </p><p></p><p>About the same (though the color tint may be slightly different) as the Leupold Cascades though the focusing action is very light on the Cascades but very heavy on the Legend. </p><p></p><p>Nice wide field and they seem quite sharp to my eye and slightly better than the Legend 8x42 roofs (though they're no slouches themselves).</p><p></p><p>The Legend are also BIG and rather "flat" (wide) when set at my IPD (male average) 65mm. I have big hands and my index finger doesn't quite center on the focuser so even smaller people might have a problem here. My thumb can reach under but they seem a bit on the large side. The force to move the focus is significant but they might loosen up in use. The Cascades are much more "roof-like" with their internal focuser. They certainly need a lot less force. I'd say the Legends need more forece to move them than any other porro is my collection (Leupold Cascade, Leupold Yosemite, Celestron Ultima DX, EO Raptor/Vixen Forester, random cheaper Japanese 10x50s). They may also be more waterproof <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p>The ergonomics are decent with the bulging rubber (like the Legend roofs) being quite useful but I think I'd prefer a bit less rubber and a bit less weight. I suspect with lighter armor these could be 26oz bins. That's a win for the Ultima DX and the Cascades. Still the optics are very nice.</p><p></p><p>Very good value for money but may not work ergonomically for some.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kevin Purcell, post: 1375025, member: 68323"] With all the rain here it's difficult to test bins outside but I went out in the wind and drizzle (fun!) today. The Legend 8x42 porros look very good. Very good value for money and as has been said (by FrankD) a notch optically above the Ultima DX mostly from the reduced field curvature -- I haven't ABed them yet. About the same (though the color tint may be slightly different) as the Leupold Cascades though the focusing action is very light on the Cascades but very heavy on the Legend. Nice wide field and they seem quite sharp to my eye and slightly better than the Legend 8x42 roofs (though they're no slouches themselves). The Legend are also BIG and rather "flat" (wide) when set at my IPD (male average) 65mm. I have big hands and my index finger doesn't quite center on the focuser so even smaller people might have a problem here. My thumb can reach under but they seem a bit on the large side. The force to move the focus is significant but they might loosen up in use. The Cascades are much more "roof-like" with their internal focuser. They certainly need a lot less force. I'd say the Legends need more forece to move them than any other porro is my collection (Leupold Cascade, Leupold Yosemite, Celestron Ultima DX, EO Raptor/Vixen Forester, random cheaper Japanese 10x50s). They may also be more waterproof ;) The ergonomics are decent with the bulging rubber (like the Legend roofs) being quite useful but I think I'd prefer a bit less rubber and a bit less weight. I suspect with lighter armor these could be 26oz bins. That's a win for the Ultima DX and the Cascades. Still the optics are very nice. Very good value for money but may not work ergonomically for some. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Bushnell - Bausch & Lomb
Bushnell 8x42 Legend Porro or Yosemite 8x30 ?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top