What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Conservation
Bush's legacy?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dantheman" data-source="post: 1339298" data-attributes="member: 32998"><p>Not sure if this is quite Ruffled Feathers material yet (maybe it will develop a need to go there if it carries on . . . )</p><p></p><p>True, it states on this website that politics shouldn't be discussed (along with religion, cage birds etc etc . . .), but sometimes they come in as an integral part of a discussion. Appreciate that as a whole load of people in the USA may share <u>some</u> political beliefs with a party or individual for other reasons and so be offended when that one is attacked. But it is really only in relation to conservation issues that this has been discussed so far.</p><p></p><p>Maybe a fuller discussion in RF would be better, but even then, not a great idea to go down the route of politics, as it can only end in tears.</p><p></p><p>Maybe some helpful suggestions on how likely these negative rulings (for wildlife) are likely to be overturned once the new president comes in?? (Or not . . . <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /> )</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dantheman, post: 1339298, member: 32998"] Not sure if this is quite Ruffled Feathers material yet (maybe it will develop a need to go there if it carries on . . . ) True, it states on this website that politics shouldn't be discussed (along with religion, cage birds etc etc . . .), but sometimes they come in as an integral part of a discussion. Appreciate that as a whole load of people in the USA may share [U]some[/U] political beliefs with a party or individual for other reasons and so be offended when that one is attacked. But it is really only in relation to conservation issues that this has been discussed so far. Maybe a fuller discussion in RF would be better, but even then, not a great idea to go down the route of politics, as it can only end in tears. Maybe some helpful suggestions on how likely these negative rulings (for wildlife) are likely to be overturned once the new president comes in?? (Or not . . . ;) ) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Conservation
Bush's legacy?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top