What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Swarovski
Buyer's remorse
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sancho" data-source="post: 1735498" data-attributes="member: 27039"><p>Convinced now. I can´t explain it technically, but they appear sharper and more contrasty than anything else I own. I didn´t think the "flat field" would be that important, given that we only use the centre anyway for viewing birds. But it is very, very impressive. To the extent that now, when I look through, say, Zens or EII´s, I really notice the softening of the image at the periphery, and it irks me somewhat. The FOV isn´t much narrower than the EII 8x30, and although heavier than those or Canon IS 10x30, I can hold them very steady. The SV are so flare-free that the Canons flare is now also very noticeable. The caveat is still "rolling-ball", which doesn´t bother me, but may annoy some. I´m not sure why, really. I find that if I look for rolling-ball when panning across a tree-line, I´ll see it because I´m thinking about it. But if I´m panning to view a flying bird, I don´t notice the rolling-ball at all, only the bird.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sancho, post: 1735498, member: 27039"] Convinced now. I can´t explain it technically, but they appear sharper and more contrasty than anything else I own. I didn´t think the "flat field" would be that important, given that we only use the centre anyway for viewing birds. But it is very, very impressive. To the extent that now, when I look through, say, Zens or EII´s, I really notice the softening of the image at the periphery, and it irks me somewhat. The FOV isn´t much narrower than the EII 8x30, and although heavier than those or Canon IS 10x30, I can hold them very steady. The SV are so flare-free that the Canons flare is now also very noticeable. The caveat is still "rolling-ball", which doesn´t bother me, but may annoy some. I´m not sure why, really. I find that if I look for rolling-ball when panning across a tree-line, I´ll see it because I´m thinking about it. But if I´m panning to view a flying bird, I don´t notice the rolling-ball at all, only the bird. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Swarovski
Buyer's remorse
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top