BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is absolutely FREE!

Register for an account to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="SuperDuty" data-source="post: 3309138" data-attributes="member: 133977"><p>If you have to look for it, and even work at finding it, then you don't have any understand of what I'm talking about. I don't see rolling ball at all in SV binoculars, but Steve C is selling his because of it, as well he should if it bothers him that much. I'm not finding horrific CA in my SV, never ever said that, what I'm saying is the that by far the best overall optical image I've ever seen has a touch more CA than I like to see. Can it be made better without harming the overall image, or making the binocular weigh 100 pounds, or making them cost 35,000 ?, damned if I know. When Steve C, Frank, Piere, etc review binoculars and give their findings on something I don't notice this level of scrutiny.</p></blockquote><p></p>