• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Where premium quality meets exceptional value. ZEISS Conquest HDX.

California ID help (1 Viewer)

pablopg

Active member
Some pictures from Sonoma (California) in august.

The bird in picture 2 and 3 with a very short tail doesn't match with anything...

The other 2 birds, in picture 1, the small one seems a house finch(?) and the other one, I have no idea.

Thanks in advance!

Pablo
 

Attachments

  • 20190225_130330.jpg
    20190225_130330.jpg
    718.5 KB · Views: 99
  • 20190225_130314.jpg
    20190225_130314.jpg
    364 KB · Views: 77
  • 20190225_130302.jpg
    20190225_130302.jpg
    358.3 KB · Views: 41
The Western Bluebird on the wire has lost its tail through some accident or near escape from a predator; it is not normally so short and that is why it does not match anything in the field guide.
 
Last edited:
I disagree with House Sparrow for the bird on the left in the first photo. I am confident it's a House Finch. Its beak is noticeably curved and bulky, more so than a House Sparrow's. And I would expect to see dark streaks on the back of a female House Sparrow. Its flanks are in bright sunlight and the photo quality isn't great which makes it difficult to see streaking there.
 
Last edited:
I disagree with House Sparrow for the bird on the left in the first photo. I am confident it's a House Finch. Its beak is noticeably curved and bulky, more so than a House Sparrow's. And I would expect to see dark streaks on the back of a female House Sparrow. Its flanks are in bright sunlight and the photo quality isn't great which makes it difficult to see streaking there.

Have to agree. The tail’s a bit long for House Sparrow as well. . ..
 
Last edited:
Warning! This thread is more than 6 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top