• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Where premium quality meets exceptional value. ZEISS Conquest HDX.

Cambridgeshire Birding (75 Viewers)

Grafham Water 24 Aug; an Osprey in from the east high over the dam at 08:30; not necessarily the regular bird?
Lots if Shags in the Midlands currently......
 
Grafham water 28 Aug; single Great White Egret still off lagoons. Marsh Harrier and 5 Arctic Terns (RP) . Dunlin still on the dam. At least 10 Yellow-legged Gulls.
 
Grafham Water 1 Sep; Great White Egret and Osprey plus single Ringed Plover.
Dunlin early afternoon at dam
2 Shags on Hill Farm water tower in evening.
 
Last edited:
Grafham Water 10 Sep ; 3 Sandwich Terns off Fishing Lodge briefly at 07:10. Plus a Caspian Gull juv under review; later same bird on the dam bridge. No Shag....
Also a female Marsh Harrier with red wing tag.

Nice Shag Photos Mark; I’m still waiting for my perfect Shag opportunity.....
 
Last edited:
Grafham Water 12 Sep: 4 Sanderling on the dam early morning. Single Shag on the tower off Hill Farm all pm. A Caspian Gull type 3W at the fishing lodge - pm
 
Grafham Water 19 Sep; single Great White Egret at west end mid morning; a Dunlin on the dam; still several Yellow Wagtails on the dam.
 
Last edited:
Grafham Water 25 Sep, evening; a visit to try to see the reported 'hybrid' Baikal Teal type off Plummer Carpark.
Eventually seen just before dusk with a few Teal, Gadwall and Shoveler but only briefly as the ducks were distant and in and out of the willows; no photos possible. Obviously not a Teal and showing faint male Baikal type markings. So what features point to hybrid? There can't be many birders experienced in eclipse Baikal Teals in the UK. Hope for better views tomorrow.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 4 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top