What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
Canon 100 - 400 mark ii latest thoughts
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mike_gss" data-source="post: 3289041" data-attributes="member: 130756"><p>Can I ask what might be a daft question?</p><p></p><p>I'm re-entering "enthusiast hobby" photography after a long gap during which I was just a "snapper" really. I was given the entry-level Canon 100D as a present 9 months ago and I don't feel I can in all decency to the donor just upgrade it at this time. On the principle of "glass first" I bought the 24-105 L zoom as my "walkaround" lens (which I love) and have been keeping an eye on the second-hand market for 100-400 Mk1's (c.£700 at MBP) but the reviews for the Mk2 seem so good that I'm tempted to go for it. My budget is "fair" but certainly not unlimited (I wish!). I could <em>just about </em>manage the Mk2 at HDEW's price (£1499 when I last looked).</p><p></p><p>My question (sorry it's taken me this long to get to it <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> ) is will the Mk2 actually work OK on my 100D? I accept that the AF will be a little slow (although my 24-105 L is quite quick) and that it probably won't work with a converter but hopefully that'll come after the eventual body upgrade.</p><p></p><p>Thanks!</p><p>Mike</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mike_gss, post: 3289041, member: 130756"] Can I ask what might be a daft question? I'm re-entering "enthusiast hobby" photography after a long gap during which I was just a "snapper" really. I was given the entry-level Canon 100D as a present 9 months ago and I don't feel I can in all decency to the donor just upgrade it at this time. On the principle of "glass first" I bought the 24-105 L zoom as my "walkaround" lens (which I love) and have been keeping an eye on the second-hand market for 100-400 Mk1's (c.£700 at MBP) but the reviews for the Mk2 seem so good that I'm tempted to go for it. My budget is "fair" but certainly not unlimited (I wish!). I could [I]just about [/I]manage the Mk2 at HDEW's price (£1499 when I last looked). My question (sorry it's taken me this long to get to it :) ) is will the Mk2 actually work OK on my 100D? I accept that the AF will be a little slow (although my 24-105 L is quite quick) and that it probably won't work with a converter but hopefully that'll come after the eventual body upgrade. Thanks! Mike [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
Canon 100 - 400 mark ii latest thoughts
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top