What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Macro Photography
Canon 100mm f2.8 Macro IS L lens
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Roy C" data-source="post: 1855566" data-attributes="member: 18798"><p>Were these shot hand-held or with a tripod? Not to say that one could not express an opinion if they were hand held but comparison between the two lenses would be meaningless - e.g on one of the shots you may have not held the lens quite as steady as the other (at macro distances you would only have to move the lens a tad to render it out of focus). </p><p></p><p>It would be interesting to see a comparison between the two under controlled conditions: Static subject at macro distance, Tripod and remote release (or timer). That way you would have a fair comparison.</p><p></p><p>Edit: I see they were both hand held so my post is applicable IMO.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Roy C, post: 1855566, member: 18798"] Were these shot hand-held or with a tripod? Not to say that one could not express an opinion if they were hand held but comparison between the two lenses would be meaningless - e.g on one of the shots you may have not held the lens quite as steady as the other (at macro distances you would only have to move the lens a tad to render it out of focus). It would be interesting to see a comparison between the two under controlled conditions: Static subject at macro distance, Tripod and remote release (or timer). That way you would have a fair comparison. Edit: I see they were both hand held so my post is applicable IMO. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Macro Photography
Canon 100mm f2.8 Macro IS L lens
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top